Abstract

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS)—a simplified, qualitative version of echocardiography—is a well-established tool in the armamentarium of critical care and emergency medicine. This review explores the extent to which FoCUS could also be used to enhance the preoperative physical examination to better utilise resources and identify those who would benefit most from detailed echocardiography prior to surgery. Among the range of pathologies that FoCUS can screen for, the conditions it provides the most utility in the preoperative setting are left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and, in certain circumstances, significant aortic stenosis (AS). Thus, FoCUS could help answer two common preoperative diagnostic questions. First, in a patient with high cardiovascular risk who subjectively reports a good functional status, is there evidence of LVSD? Second, does an asymptomatic patient with a systolic murmur have significant aortic stenosis? Importantly, many cardiac pathologies of relevance to perioperative care fall outside the scope of FoCUS, including regional wall motion abnormalities, diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular outflow obstruction, and pulmonary hypertension. Current evidence suggests that after structured training in FoCUS and performance of 20–30 supervised examinations, clinicians can achieve competence in basic cardiac ultrasound image acquisition. However, it is not known precisely how many training exams are necessary to achieve competence in FoCUS image interpretation. Given the short history of FoCUS use in preoperative evaluation, further research is needed to determine what additional questions FoCUS is suited to answer in the pre-operative setting.

Highlights

  • Preoperative assessment clinics are an essential component of the emerging perioperative care model; they improve care coordination and reduce surgical complications (Blitz et al, 2016; Grocott et al, 2017)

  • Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) can enhance the physical examination during the clinic visit, which may help better steward resources and identify those patients who would most benefit from detailed echocardiography

  • Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) can vary greatly, from 2–5% seen in a large community sample (Spencer et al, 2013), up to 30% seen in a large sample of 10,710 symptomatic patients suspected of having LVSD (Madhok et al, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Background

Preoperative assessment clinics are an essential component of the emerging perioperative care model; they improve care coordination and reduce surgical complications (Blitz et al, 2016; Grocott et al, 2017). Global left ventricular (LV) systolic function assessment is perhaps the most useful application of preoperative FoCUS: this skillset seems to be learned and can help identify patients with LVSD, a condition with high perioperative risk (Spencer et al, 2013). The growing sophistication of machine learning algorithms in diagnostic imaging may eventually enable automated interpretation of FoCUS exam images at the bedside for a broad range of cardiac conditions (Alsharqi et al, 2018) Until either of these events occurs, clinicians will likely need to rely on currently available tools for cardiovascular evaluation and risk stratification (e.g. history/physical, brain natriuretic peptide levels, CPET), while utilizing FOCUS for its current indications: to look for LVSD or AS in a subset of patients

Conclusions
Findings
Availability of data and materials Not applicable
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call