Abstract

Production and perception experiments were conducted to examine whether focus prosody varies by phrase-initial tones in Seoul Korean. We also trained an automatic classifier to locate prosodic focus within a sentence. Overall, focus prosody in Seoul Korean was weak and confusing in production, and poorly identified in perception. However, Seoul Korean’s focus prosody differed between phrase-initial low and high tones. The low tone group induced a smaller pitch increase by focus than the high tone group. The low tone group was also subject to a greater degree of confusion, although both tone groups showed some degree of confusion spanning the entire phrase as a focus effect. The identification rate was, therefore, approximately half in the low tone group (23.5%) compared to the high tone group (40%). In machine classification, the high tone group was also more accurately identified (high: 86% vs. low: 68%) when trained separately, and the machine’s general performance when the two tone groups were trained together was much superior to the human’s (machine: 65% vs. human: 32%). Although the focus prosody in Seoul Korean was weak and confusing, the identification rate of focus was higher under certain circumstances, which avers that focus prosody can vary within a single language.

Highlights

  • Focus highlights a particular element in a sentence (Bolinger 1972; Xu and Xu 2005)

  • The overall identification rate was 40.0% for the high tone group, but only 23.5% for the low tone group. These results indicate that tone group and prosodic focus interact asymmetrically in Seoul Korean (SK): The identification rate of focus positions in the high tone group was roughly twice higher than that of the low tone group

  • We examined the focus prosody of SK using telephone numbers by conducting production and human perception experiments and building machine learning classifiers to test our three working hypotheses: (a) SK’s prosodic marking of focus is weak, (b) prosodic marking of focus is confusing because its focus effect is spread over the entire phrase, (c) a machine classifier has difficulty correctly identifying prosodic focus in SK due to weak and confusing prosodic cues, but a focused

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Focus highlights a particular element in a sentence (Bolinger 1972; Xu and Xu 2005). It is normally modulated by prosodic prominence to emphasize its importance in communication. In English, prominence is marked by a post-lexical pitch accent on the head (i.e., a stressed syllable) of a word (Beckman and Pierrehumbert 1986; Cohan 2000; Jun 2011; Ladd 1996). Prosodic focus in American English is well identified by a machine classifier with a high accuracy (92%) (Cho et al 2019). In Mandarin Chinese, it is cued by the head of a word, but is distinctively characterized by the tone shape of individual lexical tones (Lee et al 2016; Liu 2009; Yuan 2004)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call