Focal Species: A Multi‐Species Umbrella for Nature Conservation
To prevent the further loss of species from landscapes used for productive enterprises such as agriculture, forestry, and grazing, it is necessary to determine the composition, quantity, and configuration of landscape elements required to meet the needs of the species present. I present a multi‐species approach for defining the attributes required to meet the needs of the biota in a landscape and the management regimes that should be applied. The approach builds on the concept of umbrella species, whose requirements are believed to encapsulate the needs of other species. It identifies a suite of “focal species,” each of which is used to define different spatial and compositional attributes that must be present in a landscape and their appropriate management regimes. All species considered at risk are grouped according to the processes that threaten their persistence. These threats may include habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, weed invasion, and fire. Within each group, the species most sensitive to the threat is used to define the minimum acceptable level at which that threat can occur. For example, the area requirements of the species most limited by the availability of particular habitats will define the minimum suitable area of those habitat types; the requirements of the most dispersal‐limited species will define the attributes of connecting vegetation; species reliant on critical resources will define essential compositional attributes; and species whose populations are limited by processes such as fire, predation, or weed invasion will define the levels at which these processes must be managed. For each relevant landscape parameter, the species with the most demanding requirements for that parameter is used to define its minimum acceptable value. Because the most demanding species are selected, a landscape designed and managed to meet their needs will encompass the requirements of all other species.
338
- 10.1007/bf01867252
- May 1, 1986
- Environmental Management
121
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-4018-1_18
- Jan 1, 1983
146
- 10.2307/1941875
- Nov 1, 1992
- Ecological Applications
2716
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x
- Dec 1, 1990
- Conservation Biology
207
- 10.1016/0006-3207(93)90321-q
- Jan 1, 1993
- Biological Conservation
138
- 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90054-x
- Jan 1, 1994
- Biological Conservation
449
- 10.1017/cbo9780511623400.006
- Aug 13, 1987
47
- 10.1071/pc940170
- Jan 1, 1994
- Pacific Conservation Biology
63
- 10.2307/1311299
- Sep 1, 1990
- BioScience
- Research Article
41
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.001
- Aug 12, 2017
- Land Use Policy
More cool than tool: Equivoques, conceptual traps and weaknesses of ecological networks in environmental planning and conservation
- Book Chapter
2
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-6320-6_3
- Jan 1, 2006
The need for long-term biodiversity monitoring using standardized protocols led to the creation of the Tropical Ecology, Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) initiative. At some 50 field stations in tropical forests around the world, TEAM will monitor various taxa such as ants, birds, butterflies, medium and large terrestrial mammals, primates, litter fall, and trees, as well as landscape change in nine tropical biodiversity hotspots and three tropical wilderness areas. The TEAM terrestrial mammal program calls for using a grid of camera phototraps to monitor long-term trends in densities and occupancy rates of species that can or cannot be uniquely identified, respectively. We describe the TEAM camera phototrapping program and provide results for the first TEAM site–Caxiuanã National Forest in northern Brazil. An intensive one year camera trapping effort was carried out to determine which months were most suitable for long-term monitoring. Fifteen species of medium and large terrestrial mammals and two large birds were recorded, including three xenarthrans, five carnivores, one perissodactyle, three artiodactyles, two rodents, and one marsupial. The medium and large terrestrial mammal diversity was well represented during two consecutive wet and dry months, respectively. We also recorded activity patterns for all species photographed by our camera traps more than 10 times.
- Research Article
3
- 10.5738/jale.14.41
- Jan 1, 2009
- Landscape Ecology and Management
都市域の孤立神社林における木本種の多様性保全のための焦点生物種選定手法の適用
- Research Article
- 10.15446/abc.v28n3.102330
- Sep 5, 2023
- Acta Biológica Colombiana
Se analizó el ensamble de la comunidad de mamíferos terrestres no voladores del Refugio Nacional de Vida Silvestre Gandoca-Manzanillo, localidad de Gandoca, Costa Rica. Se emplearon trampas Sherman y Tomahawk, cámaras trampa, recorridos diurnos y nocturnos y se aplicaron encuestas a locales. Se obtuvo el registro de 22 especies, pertenecientes a seis órdenes; siendo Rodentia y Carnivora los más representativos, con ocho y seis especies respectivamente. De la riqueza total, 9,1 % se encuentra categorizada en el apéndice I; 4,5 % en el apéndice II y 27,3 en el apéndice III del CITES. De acuerdo con la UICN, Ateles geoffroyi se encuentra incluido en la categoría peligro de extinción, mientras que Alouatta palliata y Cebus imitator se encuentran en la categoría vulnerable. Se aplicó el índice Prioridades de Conservación, suma de índices (SUMIN) elaborado por Reca et al., (1994); encontrando que cuatro de las especies registradas correspondieron con la categoría máxima prioridad de conservación y ocho se ubican en atención especial. Mediante las encuestas se obtuvo información de 37 especies. Se destaca que el 90 % de los entrevistados conoce el papel ecológico que desempeñan los mamíferos y el 75 % señaló disminución en sus poblaciones causada por la cacería (58 %) y la deforestación (32 %). Se concluye que la localidad de Gandoca tiene una riqueza alta de mamíferos terrestres y su ensamblaje de especies posee características particulares, como la ausencia de grandes depredadores. Existen acciones antrópicas que están alterando la composición y abundancia de la mastofauna de la zona.
- Research Article
12
- 10.3390/f11030353
- Mar 21, 2020
- Forests
Umbrella species are defined as species that can be rare and sensitive to human disturbance, whose protection may confer the protection of other co-occurring species. The dragon’s blood tree Dracaena cinnabari Balf.f. was already considered an umbrella species on Socotra Island (Indic Ocean, Yemen) due to its ecological importance for some native biota. We studied the reptile community living on D. cinnabari from Socotra Island. We sampled reptiles on trees across most D. cinnabari populations and applied co-occurrence and network partition analyses to check if the presence of reptiles on D. cinnabari populations was random or structured. Regardless of its patched and scarce actual distribution, we report the use of this tree as a habitat by more than half of the reptile community (12 endemic reptiles). Co-occurrence and network partition analyses demonstrate that this community is structured across the distribution of dragon’s blood trees, reflecting complex allopatric, vicariant, and biotic interaction processes. Hence, these trees act as micro-hotspots for reptiles, that is, as areas where endemic and rare species that are under threat at the landscape scale co-occur. This Socotra endemic tree is currently threatened by overgrazing, overmaturity, and climate change. Its protection and declaration as an umbrella species are expected to benefit the reptile community and to protect evolutionary processes that are partially driven by the ecological links between reptiles and this tree. To our knowledge, no tree species has been proposed as an umbrella species for island vertebrate endemics so far, highlighting the ecological uniqueness of Socotra Island.
- Research Article
62
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.028
- Mar 12, 2015
- Forest Ecology and Management
How important is dead wood for woodpeckers foraging in eastern North American boreal forests?
- Research Article
3
- 10.4172/2332-2543.1000107
- Jan 1, 2013
- Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species
Landscape structure is a key factor for biodiversity conservation. We assessed the potential role of landscaperelated habitat structure on Hazel Grouse (Tetrastesbonasia) by recording the occurrence of the species. Hazel Grouse is a widely recognized endangered species, because of the habitat loss as a direct consequence of land use change that is jeopardizing the species survival. The aim of this study is to provide a method based on habitat suitability modelling to explore and analyse hazel grouse- landscape structure and its relation to key habitat features. We evaluated landscape factors and critical threshold for monitoring the species, in order to assess the predictive power of models based on field surveys, ancillary information and high resolution infrared aerial photographs. We tested Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) algorithm, in order to predict the distribution of Hazel Grouse species, in the complex mountain landscape within the study site. This presence-only modelling method has showed numerous advantages over many other approaches. It is based on a function that links the fitness of individuals to their environment. Our results were highly consistent with field knowledge, showing that habitat modelling generated using spatial statistics and GIS can effectively help in the characterization of habitat requirements and the localization of the species suitable habitat. We found also that key drivers of Hazel Grouse distribution are not only environmental factors, in particular linked to elevation in mountain areas, but also landscape heterogeneity is a key feature. Hence, conservation of this species will require land management practices that maintain heterogeneous landscape; in particular small forest openings are essential for the species. The approach developed seem to be a promising operational tool for local and regional managers interested in species monitoring and management within the long term.
- Research Article
61
- 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00773.x
- May 12, 2011
- Diversity and Distributions
Abstract Aim Large, charismatic and wide‐ranging animals are often employed as focal species for prioritizing landscape linkages in threatened ecosystems (i.e. ‘connectivity conservation’), but there have been few efforts to assess empirically whether focal species co‐occur with other species of conservation interest within potential linkages. We evaluated whether the African elephant (Loxodonta africana), a world‐recognized flagship species, would serve as an appropriate focal species for other large mammals in a potential linkage between two major protected area complexes.Location A 15,400 km2 area between the Ruaha and Selous ecosystems in central Tanzania, East Africa.Methods We used walking transects to assess habitat, human activity and co‐occurrence of elephants and 48 other large mammal species (> 1 kg) at 63 sites using animal sign and direct sightings. We repeated a subset of transects to estimate species detectability using occupancy modelling. We used logistic regression and AIC model selection to characterize patterns of elephant occurrence and assessed correlation of elephant presence with richness of large mammals and subgroups. We considered other possible focal species, compared habitat‐based linear regression models of large mammal richness and used circuit theory to examine potential connectivity spatially.Results Elephants were detected in many locations across the potential linkage. Elephant presence was highly positively correlated with the richness of large mammals, as well as ungulates, carnivores, large carnivores and species > 45 kg in body mass (‘megafauna’). Outside of protected areas, both mammal richness and elephant presence were negatively correlated with human population density and distance from water. Only one other potential focal species was more strongly correlated with species richness than elephants, but detectability was highest for elephants.Main conclusions Although African elephants have dispersal abilities that exceed most other terrestrial mammals, conserving elephant movement corridors may effectively preserve habitat and potential landscape linkages for other large mammal species among Tanzanian reserves.
- Research Article
55
- 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.06.004
- Jul 1, 2013
- Comptes Rendus. Biologies
The impact of Acacia saligna invasion on Italian coastal dune EC habitats
- Research Article
71
- 10.1007/s10531-007-9180-8
- Jun 6, 2007
- Biodiversity and Conservation
Many landscapes that straddle the rural/urban divide suffer from low levels of species diversity following extensive clearing and fragmentation of native vegetation communities and conversion of land to agriculture. Further pressures are placed on remnant vegetation by encroaching urban expansion. These landscapes now exhibit a mosaic of small, patchy vegetation remnants that are under considerable pressure from housing and light-industrial development. Furthermore, agriculture in these landscapes tends to be of high economic value from uses such as intensive horticulture. Concerted and well-planned efforts are needed to balance the many conflicts of interest and competing demands for land with the need to restore landscapes for the protection of biodiversity. There has been a recent move in Australia toward regional biodiversity planning and goal setting, however specific detail on how to plan for achieving targets in complex landscapes is lacking. This paper applies a systematic landscape restoration model to a mixed-use, peri-urban landscape on the northern fringes of Adelaide, South Australia. The region contains fragments of remnant vegetation amongst a mosaic of high-value horticulture, light industry and urban development. Models produce maximally efficient solutions that meet comprehensive, adequate and representative conservation targets. Further constraints are added to the model to take into account the value of agricultural output, the biodiversity value of remnants, and property size and tenure. The effects on solution efficiencies as the number of constraints increase are investigated. This paper demonstrates the flexibility found in applying a systematic landscape restoration methodology. The process we present can be transferred to any rural–urban fringe region.
- Research Article
27
- 10.1111/1365-2664.13234
- Jul 23, 2018
- Journal of Applied Ecology
Habitat loss, fragmentation, and alteration of the landscape matrix are interdependent processes, collectively responsible for most recent species extinctions. Thus, determining the extent to which these landscape processes affect animals is critical for conservation. However, researchers have often assumed that interdependent effects are independently related to animals’ responses, underestimating the importance of one or several landscape processes in driving species declines. We demonstrate how to disentangle the interdependent effects of habitat amount, fragmentation, and edge context on population size by assessing abundance of a rapidly declining grassland songbird species (grasshopper sparrow Ammodramus savannarum) in eastern Kansas (USA). We conducted >7,000 point count surveys at >2,000 sites over two breeding seasons, then modelled the direct, interactive, and indirect effects of landscape factors on abundance within spatial scales (200‐, 400‐, 800‐, and 1,600‐m radii) relevant to our focal species’ dispersal behaviour. Sparrow abundance correlated most strongly with landscape structure within 400‐m radii, increasing nonlinearly with grassland area and decreasing with the proportion of grassland near cropland or woody edges. Sparrows’ negative response to cropland edges was mostly an added, indirect consequence of reduced grassland area, whereas sparrows’ stronger negative response to woody edges was not attributable to variation in grassland area. Fragmentation and edge context mattered most in landscapes comprising c. 50%–80% grassland. Synthesis and applications. In our research, abundance of a threatened grassland songbird was influenced more by core grassland area (a function of total grassland area, fragmentation, and edge context) than total grassland area per se. Moreover, a local extinction threshold of c. 50% grassland indicated that small amounts of habitat were unsuitable for our focal species regardless of habitat configuration or matrix type. Local extinction thresholds in response to habitat area provide clear baseline targets for land managers; above those thresholds, configuration and the matrix can be modified to increase abundance of edge‐sensitive animals. Conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the importance of fragmentation and matrix features could be partially explained by species‐level traits, or methodological issues such as defining landscapes at ecologically arbitrary spatial scales, assessing landscape quality using species richness, and ignoring interactive and indirect effects.
- Research Article
215
- 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2002.00152.x
- Jul 15, 2002
- Agricultural and Forest Entomology
Landscape structure, habitat fragmentation, and the ecology of insects
- Research Article
17
- 10.1111/ecog.02542
- Nov 11, 2016
- Ecography
Ecological theory is essential to predict the effects of global changes such as habitat loss and fragmentation on biodiversity. Species–area relationships (SAR), metapopulation models (MEP) and species distribution models (SDM) are commonly used tools incorporating different ecological processes to explain biodiversity distribution and dynamics. Yet few studies have compared the outcomes of these disparate models and investigated their complementarity. Here we show that the processes underlying SAR (patch area), MEP (patch isolation) and SDM (environmental conditions) models can be compared with a common statistical framework. Our approach allows for species and community‐level predictions under current and future landscape scenarios, facilitates multi‐model comparison and provides the machinery for integrating multiple mechanisms into one model. We apply this framework to the distribution of eight focal vertebrate species in current and future projected landscapes where 10% of the landscape is lost to land‐use change in southwestern, Quebec, Canada. Based on a model selection approach, we found that a model including patch area was the top ranked model for four of our focal species and models including patch isolation and environmental conditions were the top ranked models for two focal species each. Community‐level predictions of models based on patch area, patch isolation and environmental conditions for both current and future landscapes showed high spatial overlap, however, patch area models always predicted a reduction of species richness per patch whereas both the patch isolation and environmental conditions models predicted an increase or decrease in species richness per patch following habitat loss and fragmentation. Our comparative tool will allow ecologists and conservation practitioners to relate structural uncertainty to key mechanisms underlying each model. Ultimately, this approach is one step in the direction of deriving robust predictions for the change and loss of biodiversity under global change, which is key for informing conservation plans.
- Research Article
24
- 10.1016/j.jnc.2010.10.001
- Nov 18, 2010
- Journal for Nature Conservation
Selecting focal species in ecological network planning following an expert-based approach: Italian reptiles as a case study
- Research Article
11
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01039.x
- Jan 14, 2009
- Conservation Biology
We used a species-distribution modeling approach, ground-based climate data sets, and newly available remote-sensing data on vegetation from the MODIS and Quick Scatterometer sensors to investigate the combined effects of human-caused habitat alterations and climate on potential invasions of rainforest by 3 savanna snake species in Cameroon, Central Africa: the night adder (Causus maculatus), olympic lined snake (Dromophis lineatus), and African house snake (Lamprophis fuliginosus). Models with contemporary climate variables and localities from native savanna habitats showed that the current climate in undisturbed rainforest was unsuitable for any of the snake species due to high precipitation. Limited availability of thermally suitable nest sites and mismatches between important life-history events and prey availability are a likely explanation for the predicted exclusion from undisturbed rainforest. Models with only MODIS-derived vegetation variables and savanna localities predicted invasion in disturbed areas within the rainforest zone, which suggests that human removal of forest cover creates suitable microhabitats that facilitate invasions into rainforest. Models with a combination of contemporary climate, MODIS- and Quick Scatterometer-derived vegetation variables, and forest and savanna localities predicted extensive invasion into rainforest caused by rainforest loss. In contrast, a projection of the present-day species-climate envelope on future climate suggested a reduction in invasion potential within the rainforest zone as a consequence of predicted increases in precipitation. These results emphasize that the combined responses of deforestation and climate change will likely be complex in tropical rainforest systems.
- Research Article
48
- 10.1111/ddi.12066
- May 1, 2013
- Diversity and Distributions
AimMost risk assessments and decisions in conservation are based on surrogate approaches, where a group of species or environmental indicators are selected as proxies for other aspects of biodiversity. In the focal species approach, a suite of species is selected based on life history characteristics, such as dispersal limitation and area requirements. Testing the validity of the focal species concept has proved difficult, due to a lack of theory justifying the underlying framework, explicit objectives and measures of success. We sought to understand the conditions under which the focal species concept has merit for conservation decisions.LocationOur model system comprised 10 vertebrate species in 39 patches of native forest embedded in pine plantation in New South Wales, Australia.MethodsWe selected three focal species based on ecological traits. We used a multiple‐species reserve selection method that minimizes the expected loss of species, by estimating the risk of extinction with a metapopulation model. We found optimal reserve solutions for multiple species, including all 10 species, the three focal species, for all possible combinations of three species, and for each species individually.ResultsOur case study suggests that the focal species approach can work: the reserve system that minimized the expected loss of the focal species also minimized the expected species loss in the larger set of 10 species. How well the solution would perform for other species and given landscape dynamics remains unknown.Main conclusionsThe focal species approach may have merit as a conservation short cut if placed within a quantitative decision‐making framework, where the aspects of biodiversity for which the focal species act as proxies are explicitly defined, and success is determined by whether the use of the proxy results in the same decision. Our methods provide a framework for testing other surrogate approaches used in conservation decision‐making and risk assessment.
- Research Article
60
- 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01851.x
- Jun 7, 2011
- Journal of Ecology
Summary 1. Biotic homogenization (BH), a dominant process shaping the response of natural communities to human disturbance, reflects both the expansion of exotic species at large scales and other mechanisms that often operate at smaller scales. 2. Here, we examined the relationship between BH in plant communities and spatio-temporal landscape disturbance (habitat fragmentation and surrounding habitat conversion) at a local scale (1 km²), using data from a standardized monitoring programme in France. We quantified BH using both a spatial partitioning of taxonomic diversity and the average habitat specialization of communities, which informs on functional BH. 3. We observed a positive relationship between local taxonomic diversity and landscape fragmentation or instability. This increase in local taxonomic diversity was, however, paralleled by a decrease in average community specialization in more fragmented landscapes and in more unstable landscapes around forest sites. The decrease in average community specialization suggests that landscape disturbance causes functional BH, but there was limited evidence for concurrent taxonomic BH. 4. Synthesis. Our results show that landscape disturbance is partly responsible for functional BH at small scales via the extirpation of specialist species, with possible consequences for ecosystem functioning. However, this change in community composition is not systematically associated with taxonomic BH. This has direct relevance in designing biodiversity indicators: metrics incorporating species sensitivity to disturbance (such as species specialization to habitat) appear much more reliable than taxonomic diversity for documenting the response of communities to disturbance.
- Research Article
162
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.021
- Jan 24, 2014
- Journal of Environmental Management
Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns
- Research Article
2
- 10.3390/su15108313
- May 19, 2023
- Sustainability
Habitat fragmentation seriously threatens urban biodiversity conservation and ecosystem integrity. Constructing an ecological network and improving the connection level between habitat patches can effectively alleviate the general ecological environmental problems of rapid urban development. In this paper, three focal animal species were selected in the central urban area of Yichang City in China. Based on the habitat quality assessment results of the InVEST model, the ecological network of the three focal species was designed by combining morphological spatial pattern analysis and least-cost path models, and a multi-species comprehensive ecological network of the study area was designed. The consensus identified 31 ecological sources, 64 ecological corridors and 151 ecological nodes. The results can provide support for biodiversity conservation and green space planning in the study area, and also provide a reference for the construction and optimization of ecological networks for biodiversity conservation in urbanized areas.
- Research Article
8
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.040
- Dec 9, 2016
- Forest Ecology and Management
Effects of landscape composition and native oak forest configuration on cavity-nesting birds of North Africa
- Research Article
71
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.017
- Feb 21, 2015
- Biological Conservation
Forest fragmentation alters microhabitat availability for Neotropical terrestrial insectivorous birds
- Research Article
15
- 10.1650/condor-18-1.1
- Nov 1, 2018
- The Condor
Wildlife-friendly agricultural practices, such as agroforestry, can play an important role in conserving biodiversity by providing and connecting habitat across working landscapes. Silvopastures (i.e. pastures with substantial tree cover), in particular, possess considerable potential for conserving biodiversity due to the dominance of pastoral landscapes in many regions. However, to balance tradeoffs between the conservation and agricultural values of these anthropogenic systems, better information on wildlife use and how it relates to habitat quality is needed. To improve our mechanistic understanding of silvopastoral habitat quality, and to develop management recommendations, we evaluated the foraging behavior of insectivorous forest birds in Andean silvopastures compared with forest fragments. Focal species' prey attack rates were >25% lower in silvopastures than in forest fragments, suggesting that arthropod prey were less abundant or accessible in silvopastures than in forest fragments. In ...
- Research Article
4
- 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02211.x
- Oct 15, 2009
- Journal of Biogeography
Understanding fragmentation: snails show the way
- Dissertation
- 10.5451/unibas-004564455
- Jan 1, 2008
Das Feuerregime im Queen Elizabeth Nationalpark, Uganda : Auswirkungen auf die Verbreitung und Habitatnutzung grosser Herbivoren
- Research Article
34
- 10.1080/01426390903177268
- Oct 1, 2009
- Landscape Research
In connectivity conservation and ecological network planning, the selection of focal fragmentation-sensitive species represents an a priori step. Despite their strategic role, selection of focal species has often been carried out following non-objective approaches. If this is done, actions of planning and conservation, especially in relation to biodiversity conservation, could be ineffective. We propose an expert-based approach to select focal species on the basis of sensitivity to three components of habitat fragmentation (habitat area reduction, increase of habitat isolation, increase of edge effect and landscape matrix disturbance) and of intrinsic ecological traits of the species (trophic level, dispersal ability, body size, niche breadth, rarity). A case study on terrestrial mammals of an area in Central Italy (province of Rome) shows that the species selected through this approach largely coincide with the species recognized in the literature as being fragmentation-sensitive. In this paper we present a conceptual framework to select focal species and to define a schematic methodology for ecological network planning and monitoring.
- Supplementary Content
- 10.1111/cobi.70117
- Sep 10, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Research Article
- 10.1111/cobi.70142
- Aug 29, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Research Article
- 10.1111/cobi.70106
- Aug 11, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Journal Issue
- 10.1111/cobi.v39.4
- Aug 1, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Research Article
- 10.1111/cobi.14306
- Jul 30, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Supplementary Content
- 10.1111/cobi.70113
- Jul 28, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Supplementary Content
- 10.1111/cobi.70078
- Jul 13, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Research Article
- 10.1111/cobi.70090
- Jun 30, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Research Article
- 10.1111/cobi.70089
- Jun 19, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Research Article
- 10.1111/cobi.70091
- Jun 19, 2025
- Conservation Biology
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.