Abstract

The pressure-driven growth model is considered, describing the motion of a foam front through an oil reservoir during foam improved oil recovery, foam being formed as gas advances into an initially liquid-filled reservoir. In the model, the foam front is represented by a set of so-called "material points" that track the advance of gas into the liquid-filled region. According to the model, the shape of the foam front is prone to develop concave sharply curved concavities, where the orientation of the front changes rapidly over a small spatial distance: these are referred to as "concave corners". These concave corners need to be propagated differently from the material points on the foam front itself. Typically the corner must move faster than those material points, otherwise spurious numerical artifacts develop in the computed shape of the front. A propagation rule or "speed up" rule is derived for the concave corners, which is shown to be sensitive to the level of anisotropy in the permeability of the reservoir and also sensitive to the orientation of the corners themselves. In particular if a corner in an anisotropic reservoir were to be propagated according to an isotropic speed up rule, this might not be sufficient to suppress spurious numerical artifacts, at least for certain orientations of the corner. On the other hand, systems that are both heterogeneous and anisotropic tend to be well behaved numerically, regardless of whether one uses the isotropic or anisotropic speed up rule for corners. This comes about because, in the heterogeneous and anisotropic case, the orientation of the corner is such that the "correct" anisotropic speed is just very slightly less than the "incorrect" isotropic one. The anisotropic rule does however manage to keep the corner very slightly sharper than the isotropic rule does.

Highlights

  • Injection of low mobility fluid into an oil reservoir would ordinarily demand very high driving pressures

  • We have shown that in a heterogeneous and anisotropic system, it is necessary to take specific account of the anisotropy in order to propagate a concave corner in such a way as to keep it sharp

  • In the context of a pressure-driven growth model, we have considered the rule for propagating a concave corner in the shape of a foam front, such as might occur during improved oil recovery within a heterogeneous and anisotropic oil reservoir

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Injection of low mobility fluid into an oil reservoir would ordinarily demand very high driving pressures. There are certain situations [11, 19, 22] where concavities are known to arise in the front shape during at least part of its time evolution These include gravity-driven drainage of the surfactant solution used to make the foam [11], a sudden increase in the injection pressure [22], and the case of a heterogeneous stratified reservoir (mentioned by [19] but never studied in detail). The pressure-driven growth model has been reformulated for the case of an anisotropic but homogeneous reservoir [21] This led to a convex front shape, similar to that for the heterogeneous reservoir, albeit with increased “gravity override”, i.e. for a given propagation distance of the leading edge of the foam front, the area left unswept beneath the front is greater.

Formulation
Governing equations for the foam front
Governing equations in dimensionless form
Accounting for heterogeneity and anisotropy
Concave corner “speed up” rule for anisotropic system
Configuration of a concave corner
Motion of a concave corner
Analysing the motion of a concave corner
Behaviour of β and ψ
Variation of vapp with respect to α
Variation of βapp with respect to α
Direction of concave corner motion for small kv
Geometrical interpretation for small kv case
Re-analysis of velocities at the corner
Numerical scheme
Numerical results
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call