Abstract

BackgroundMR Tractography enables non-invasive preoperative depiction of language subcortical tracts, which is crucial for the presurgical work-up of brain tumors; however, it cannot evaluate the exact function of the fibers.PurposeA systematic pipeline was developed to combine tractography reconstruction of language fiber bundles, based on anatomical landmarks (Anatomical-T), with language fMRI cortical activations. A fMRI-targeted Tractography (fMRI-T) was thus obtained, depicting the subsets of the anatomical tracts whose endpoints are located inside a fMRI activation. We hypothesized that fMRI-T could provide additional functional information regarding the subcortical structures, better reflecting the eloquent white matter structures identified intraoperatively.MethodsBoth Anatomical-T and fMRI-T of language fiber tracts were performed on 16 controls and preoperatively on 16 patients with left-hemisphere brain tumors, using a q-ball residual bootstrap algorithm based on High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) datasets (b = 3000 s/mm2; 60 directions); fMRI ROIs were obtained using picture naming, verbal fluency, and auditory verb generation tasks. In healthy controls, normalized MNI atlases of fMRI-T and Anatomical-T were obtained. In patients, the surgical resection of the tumor was pursued by identifying eloquent structures with intraoperative direct electrical stimulation mapping and extending surgery to the functional boundaries. Post-surgical MRI allowed to identify Anatomical-T and fMRI-T non-eloquent portions removed during the procedure.ResultsMNI Atlases showed that fMRI-T is a subset of Anatomical-T, and that different task-specific fMRI-T involve both shared subsets and task-specific subsets – e.g., verbal fluency fMRI-T strongly involves dorsal frontal tracts, consistently with the phonogical-articulatory features of this task. A quantitative analysis in patients revealed that Anatomical-T removed portions of AF-SLF and IFOF were significantly greater than verbal fluency fMRI-T ones, suggesting that fMRI-T is a more specific approach. In addition, qualitative analyses showed that fMRI-T AF-SLF and IFOF predict the exact functional limits of resection with increased specificity when compared to Anatomical-T counterparts, especially the superior frontal portion of IFOF, in a subcohort of patients.ConclusionThese results suggest that performing fMRI-T in addition to the ‘classic’ Anatomical-T may be useful in a preoperative setting to identify the ‘high-risk subsets’ that should be spared during the surgical procedure.

Highlights

  • The accurate identification of eloquent fiber tracts, such as language bundles, is a crucial step in the surgical work-up of brain tumors

  • Their generation was based on a two-step pipeline: the first step consisted in obtaining a functional MRI (fMRI)-target-Region of Interest (ROI) that reflected the subject-specific task-specific activation areas; the second step consisted in generating fMRI-targeted Tractography (fMRI-T) tracts representing the subsets of the Anatomical-T tracts whose endpoints are located inside the fMRI-target-ROI

  • A manual extension of the fMRI-ROI was performed exclusively when the endpoints of some streamlines were located within 3 voxels outside the fMRI-ROI and in the same anatomical area – a similar ROI-extension correction is reported in other fMRI-based Tractography studies (Upadhyay et al, 2007; Zhu et al, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The accurate identification of eloquent fiber tracts, such as language bundles, is a crucial step in the surgical work-up of brain tumors. MR Tractography enables the in vivo non-invasive depiction of subcortical fascicles and it has rapidly become fundamental in the presurgical assessment of brain tumors (Bello et al, 2010; Riva et al, 2011; Castellano et al, 2012; Ulmer et al, 2014), in order to evaluate the displacement or modifications of the eloquent bundles before performing brain surgery (Bello et al, 2008; Bizzi, 2009; Essayed et al, 2017), to predict the extent of resection (Castellano et al, 2012), and to Abbreviations: AF, Arcuate Fasciculus; Anatomical-T, Anatomical Tractography; AVG, Auditory Verb Generation; DES, Direct Electrical Stimulation; ExC, External/Extreme Capsule; FAT, Frontal Aslant Tract; fMRI-T, fMRI-targeted Tractography; IFOF, Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculus; ILF, Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; PN, Picture Naming; ROI, Region of Interest; SLF, Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus; SLF-II, II component of SLF; SLF-III, III component of SLF; SLF-tp, temporo-parietal (or vertical) component of SLF; UF, Uncinate Fasciculus; VF, Verbal Fluency. We hypothesized that fMRI-T could provide additional functional information regarding the subcortical structures, better reflecting the eloquent white matter structures identified intraoperatively

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call