Abstract

The neural substrate underlying reading vs. listening comprehension of sentences was compared using fMRI. One way in which this issue was addressed was by comparing the patterns of activation particularly in cortical association areas that classically are implicated in language processing. The precise locations of the activation differed between the two modalities. In the left inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's area), the activation associated with listening was more anterior and inferior than the activation associated with reading, suggesting more semantic processing during listening comprehension. In the left posterior superior and middle temporal region (roughly, Wernicke's area), the activation for listening was closer to primary auditory cortex (more anterior and somewhat more lateral) than the activation for reading. In several regions, the activation was much more left lateralized for reading than for listening. In addition to differences in the location of the activation, there were also differences in the total amount of activation in the two modalities in several regions. A second way in which the modality comparison was addressed was by examining how the neural systems responded to comprehension workload in the two modalities by systematically varying the structural complexity of the sentences to be processed. Here, the distribution of the workload increase associated with the processing of additional structural complexity was very similar across the two input modalities. The results suggest a number of subtle differences in the cognitive processing underlying listening vs. reading comprehension.

Highlights

  • The study of visual vs. auditory sentence comprehension raises interesting questions about the nature of the psychological processes and the corresponding neural substrates that are involved in understanding language

  • In addition to addressing language processing, this research question is of more general interest because much of cognitive science has been built on the assumption that higher cognitive processes manipulate only abstract information that is not associated with or affected by the input modality

  • In addition to examining the effect of modality, the current study addressed the question of how the systems that support sentence comprehension respond to variations in workload

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of visual vs. auditory sentence comprehension raises interesting questions about the nature of the psychological processes and the corresponding neural substrates that are involved in understanding language. In addition to addressing language processing, this research question is of more general interest because much of cognitive science has been built on the assumption that higher cognitive processes manipulate only abstract information that is not associated with or affected by the input modality. In addition to examining the effect of modality, the current study addressed the question of how the systems that support sentence comprehension respond to variations in workload. Cognitive workload, defined as the amount of processing and storage required for a given task, was manipulated by varying the structural complexity of the sentences to be comprehended, comparing the processing of a sentence with two conjoined active clauses to the processing of a more complex sentence containing a matrix clause with an embedded object-relative clause. One goal of the current study was to determine whether there were differences in the response to increased workload as a function of input modality

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call