Abstract

Congenital deafness is often compensated by early sign language use leading to typical language development with corresponding neural underpinnings. However, deaf individuals are frequently reported to have poorer numerical abilities than hearing individuals and it is not known whether the underlying neuronal networks differ between groups. In the present study, adult deaf signers and hearing nonsigners performed a digit and letter order tasks, during functional magnetic resonance imaging. We found the neuronal networks recruited in the two tasks to be generally similar across groups, with significant activation in the dorsal visual stream for the letter order task, suggesting letter identification and position encoding. For the digit order task, no significant activation was found for either of the two groups. Region of interest analyses on parietal numerical processing regions revealed different patterns of activation across groups. Importantly, deaf signers showed significant activation in the right horizontal portion of the intraparietal sulcus for the digit order task, suggesting engagement of magnitude manipulation during numerical order processing in this group.

Highlights

  • Numerical processing abilities are closely associated with mathematical success [1], and ordinal relationships have been suggested to be important for efficient number processing [2]

  • This showed that the digit order task (M = 1608 ms, SD = 1847) was performed faster than the letter order task (M = 2344 ms, SD = 234)

  • There was no main effect of the group in the analysis of variances performed on the horizontal portion of the intraparietal sulcus (HIPS) regions, deaf signers showed a significant activation of the rHIPS that was not found for the hearing group. This is in line with preliminary data from our lab, where we have found stronger activation for deaf signers compared to hearing nonsigners in the rHIPS in response to arithmetic tasks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerical processing abilities are closely associated with mathematical success [1], and ordinal relationships have been suggested to be important for efficient number processing [2]. In a recent study, we have shown that when groups are carefully matched on age, education, and nonverbal intelligence, arithmetic abilities are similar between groups [5]. It is not known whether the same neural networks underpin numerical order processing in deaf signers and hearing nonsigners. Deaf children have been shown to perform better than hearing children on spatial tasks [11] and nonsymbolic subtraction tasks [12] Their problems seem to be related to numerical processing that requires more abstract manipulation involving linguistic representations.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call