Abstract

The mesoporous silicate molecular sieve, MCM-41, has been synthesized from pulverized coal fly ash (PFA), where the silicate filtrate used is a by-product from hydrothermal zeolite production. Rice husk ash was also used for comparison but fusion with sodium hydroxide was used to prepare the silicate filtrate, along similar lines to earlier reports of using PFA as a precursor for MCM-41 synthesis. The MCM-41 samples are chemically and mineralogically similar to a commercially available sample, but with higher pore volumes dominated by mesopores (0.92–1.13 cf. 0.88 cm3 g−1). After polyethyleneimine (PEI) impregnation for CO2 capture, the ash derived MCM-41 samples displayed higher uptakes than the commercial sample with the maximum achievable PEI loading of 60 Wt.% PEI (dry basis) before particle agglomeration occurs, approximately 13 compared to 11 Wt.%, respectively, the latter being comparable to earlier reports in the literature. The PFA sample that displays the fastest kinetics to achieve 90% of the equilibrium uptake had the largest mesopore volume of 1.13 cm3 g−1. Given the PFA-derived MCM-41 uses a waste silicate solution for hydrothermal preparation and no prior preparation is needed, production costs are estimated to be considerable lower where silicate solutions need to be prepared by base treatment, even if ash is used, as for the RHA derived MCM-41 used here.

Highlights

  • Anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuel combustion are accepted as being major contributor to global warming, together with contributions from other greenhouse gases, methane, nitrous oxide (N2O), water vapor, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride [1]

  • CO2 absorption with aqueous amine solutions is the only mature capture technology having been used in natural gas separation for over 60 years, where recovery of CO2 is at the level of 98% efficiency [2]

  • The aim of this study is to compare the structures of MCM-41 prepared from pulverized coal fly ash (PFA) and rice husk ash (RHA) and, after PEI impregnation, compare their effectiveness for CO2 capture with a commercial sample that has been prepared conventionally

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuel combustion are accepted as being major contributor to global warming, together with contributions from other greenhouse gases, methane, nitrous oxide (N2O), water vapor, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride [1]. Power generation accounts for 30% of global CO2 emissions and there is an urgent need to deploy carbon capture and storage (CCS) to both conventional pulverized fuel coal-derived and natural gas combined cycle power plants globally, as well to major industrial emitters, including iron & steel and cement production. CO2 absorption with aqueous amine solutions (monoethyleneamine, MEA that can be used with secondary and tertiary amines) is the only mature capture technology having been used in natural gas separation for over 60 years, where recovery of CO2 is at the level of 98% efficiency [2].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call