Abstract

Shed dinosaur teeth are commonly collected microvertebrate remains that have been used for interpretations of dinosaur feeding behaviors, paleoecology, and population studies. However, such interpretations may be biased by taphonomic processes such as fluvial sorting influenced by tooth shape: shed teeth, removed from the skull during life, and teeth possessing roots, removed from the skull after death. As such, teeth may behave differently in fluvial systems due to their differences in shape. In order to determine the influence of fluvial processes on the preservation and distribution of shed and root-bearing dinosaur teeth, the hydrodynamic behaviors of high-density urethane resin casts of shed and root-bearing Allosaurus and Camarasaurus teeth were experimentally tested for relative transport distances at increasing flow velocities in an artificial fluviatile environment. Results show that tooth cast specimens exhibited comparable patterns of transport at lower velocities, though the shed Camarasaurus teeth transported considerably farther in medium to higher flow velocities. Two-Way ANOVA tests indicate significant differences in the mean transport distances of tooth casts oriented perpendicular to flow (p < 0.05) with varying tooth morphologies and flow velocities. The differences exhibited in the transportability of shed and root-bearing teeth has important implications for taphonomic reconstructions, as well as future studies on dinosaur population dynamics, paleoecology, and feeding behaviors.

Highlights

  • Scales and bone fragments are of interest for their potential uses in taphonomic reconstructions (e.g., Blob & Fiorillo, 1996; Wilson, 2008; Peterson, Scherer & Huffman, 2011), the abundance of shed dinosaur teeth in Mesozoic deposits is of particular interest in attempts to infer dental physiology (Sereno & Wilson, 2005; D’Emic et al, 2013), feeding behaviors (Jennings & Hasiotis, 2006), paleoecology (Bakker & Bir, 2004), and their potential for population studies (Erickson, 1996)

  • At lower flow velocities the teeth behave more to each other, diverging significantly at higher flow velocities. This has been previously noted for other skeletal elements during fluvial transport (e.g., Voorhies, 1969). These results demonstrate a close link between shape differences in vertebrate teeth and their potential representation in a fossil assemblage due to the influence of shape on hydrodynamic behavior (Behrensmeyer, 1975; Coard & Dennell, 1995; Peterson & Bigalke, 2013)

  • Shed and root-bearing teeth differ significantly in hydrodynamic behavior and have an increased likelihood of contributing preservational biases; elongate teeth and teeth approaching a conical shape do not transport as far with increasing flow velocities as compact teeth. This suggests that compact teeth have a higher potential for continued transport while elongate and conical teeth are more likely to remain as lag, increasing their potential for preservation in the fossil record

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Experiments on the transport of skeletal remains in controlled fluvial systems have been of significant use in deciphering relative hydrodynamic properties and behaviors of remains in vertebrate taphonomic studies (e.g., Voorhies, 1969; Behrensmeyer, 1975; Boaz & Behrensmeyer, 1976; Hanson, 1980; Blob, 1997; Nasti, 2005; Peterson & Bigalke, 2013). Scales and bone fragments are of interest for their potential uses in taphonomic reconstructions (e.g., Blob & Fiorillo, 1996; Wilson, 2008; Peterson, Scherer & Huffman, 2011), the abundance of shed dinosaur teeth in Mesozoic deposits is of particular interest in attempts to infer dental physiology (Sereno & Wilson, 2005; D’Emic et al, 2013), feeding behaviors (Jennings & Hasiotis, 2006), paleoecology (Bakker & Bir, 2004), and their potential for population studies (Erickson, 1996)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call