Abstract

This work compares Several analytical approaches are compared for in-flight flutter margin calculations for an F-16A/B in heavy store configuration. Nominal flutter model formulations are developed in terms of the dynamic pressure and the Macb number. These analysis models are expressed within the linear fractional transformation (LFT) framework for the determination of flutter onset conditions using the structured singular value μ analysis. The results obtained from classical analysis tools such as the P and P-K method, as well as the μ method are compared with each other and validated using actual flight-test data. The LFT model parameterization in terms of match-point Mach number is novel and permits a natural and efficient flight-test procedure for flutter envelope clearance. Structural parameter variations such as changes in wing mass, as well uncertainties in damping and/or stiffness, are also incorporated in the LFT formulation and permit the calculation of robust match-point flutter margins. The μ-analysis results obtained from such model formulations incorporating several simultaneous parameter variations reveal and explain the complex physical mechanisms that have led to limit-cycle oscillation conditions encountered during the flight tests.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.