Abstract

The efficacy and safety of flurbiprofen (Ansaid, Upjohn), 100 mg twice daily, were compared with those of naproxen, 250 mg twice daily, in a six-week, double-blind, randomized study involving 133 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients completing the six-week treatment phase were then treated with flurbiprofen, 100 mg twice daily, during a six-week open-label phase. In the double-blind phase, both treatment groups showed improvement from baseline and, in general, the arthritic condition of all patients was significantly less severe while receiving treatment. In the open-label phase, the patients in whom therapy was switched from naproxen to flurbiprofen reported greater improvement compared with baseline than they did at the end of the double-blind phase. Statistically significant differences between medication groups were few. At weeks four and six, grip strength for the naproxen group increased from baseline by a marginal amount compared with the flurbiprofen group. Global evaluations of disease improvement by patients and physicians and proximal interphalangeal joint size showed trends in favor of flurbiprofen. In the double-blind phase, 29.4 percent of flurbiprofen-treated patients (n = 20) and 23.1 percent of naproxentreated patients (n = 15) experienced side effects, most of which were gastrointestinal in origin. In the open-label phase, 81.0 percent of the patients (n = 87) satisfactorily completed the six weeks of flurbiprofen treatment. Based on this study, 100 mg of flurbiprofen administered twice daily was as effective as 250 mg of naproxen twice daily in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.