Abstract
Objective: To evaluate fluoride release and uptake behaviors of the new bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (activa bioactive glass ionomer) compared to conventional glass ionomer cement(CGIC) (Fuji IX GP). Material and Methods: Forty specimens were prepared (10 mm x 2 mm) from Fuji IX GP glass ionomer and Activa Bioactive RMGI according to manufacturer’s instructions. The specimens stored in deionized water and fluoride release were assessed daily in the first week then weekly till the third week using ion chromatography. The specimens of each material were divided into two equal subgroups according to the recharging agents used ; either0.05% mouth wash (226 ppm sodium fluoride, G.U.M, Sunstar, Germany, GmbH) or 5% sodium fluoride varnish (22.600ppm fluoride, enamel pro varnish Premier Dental, Plymouth Meeting, PA,19462,USA). Fluoride release after recharge was measured and recorded daily for a total of 5 days. Data were analyzed by Two way ANOVA and Duncans test (α = 0.05) using the SPSS software program. Results: CGIC release higher amount of fluoride than RMGIC. Professionally applied fluoride varnish showed better recharging ability than home care fluoride mouth wash and CGIC had greater recharge ability than new RMGIC.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
