Abstract

BackgroundFluorescence-based methods have been proposed to aid caries lesion detection. Summarizing and analysing findings of studies about fluorescence-based methods could clarify their real benefits.ObjectiveWe aimed to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of fluorescence-based methods in detecting caries lesions.Data SourceTwo independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus through June 2012 to identify papers/articles published. Other sources were checked to identify non-published literature.Study Eligibility Criteria, Participants and Diagnostic MethodsThe eligibility criteria were studies that: (1) have assessed the accuracy of fluorescence-based methods of detecting caries lesions on occlusal, approximal or smooth surfaces, in both primary or permanent human teeth, in the laboratory or clinical setting; (2) have used a reference standard; and (3) have reported sufficient data relating to the sample size and the accuracy of methods.Study Appraisal and Synthesis MethodsA diagnostic 2×2 table was extracted from included studies to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy parameters (Diagnostic Odds Ratio and Summary Receiver-Operating curve). The analyses were performed separately for each method and different characteristics of the studies. The quality of the studies and heterogeneity were also evaluated.ResultsSeventy five studies met the inclusion criteria from the 434 articles initially identified. The search of the grey or non-published literature did not identify any further studies. In general, the analysis demonstrated that the fluorescence-based method tend to have similar accuracy for all types of teeth, dental surfaces or settings. There was a trend of better performance of fluorescence methods in detecting more advanced caries lesions. We also observed moderate to high heterogeneity and evidenced publication bias.ConclusionsFluorescence-based devices have similar overall performance; however, better accuracy in detecting more advanced caries lesions has been observed.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of dental caries and its progression have decreased in recent years [1,2]

  • Results of individual studies Paired forest plots show the sensitivities and specificities of each study with their 95% confidence intervals depicted as horizontal lines, grouped by caries detection method, permanent or primary tooth and dental surface tested

  • Concerning advanced adjunct methods employed to detect dental decay based on fluorescence, a previous systematic review was performed in 2004, but this was limited to the Laser fluorescence (LF) method only [23]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of dental caries (tooth decay) and its progression have decreased in recent years [1,2]. The most common adjunct method for caries detection in clinical practice is radiography, more recently several fluorescence-based methods have been used to aid and inform the caries detection and diagnostic process. These methods are based on the principle that carious dental tissues have altered (decreased) fluorescence properties compared with sound dental tissues. Fluorescence-based methods have been proposed to aid caries lesion detection. Summarizing and analysing findings of studies about fluorescence-based methods could clarify their real benefits

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call