Abstract

Fluorescence spectroscopy with chemometric tools was used to check the milk authentication against the fraudulent addition of whey. Different commercial kinds of milk were adulterated with whey at five different levels. The fluorescence spectra of the adulterated samples showed different emission profiles when excited at the wavelength associated with tryptophan residues (295 nm). The addition of whey caused a reduction in fluorescence intensity. Nevertheless, visual inspection was not enough to discriminate between adulterations or milk types. Initial principal component analysis (PCA) explained 98.21% of the variance, PC1 (96.23%) enabled discrimination between genuine and adulterated milk, and PC2 (1.98%) discriminated by fat content in milk. However, supervised methods allowed for more efficient performances. Among the tested techniques, partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) allowed better classification than most evaluated approaches to soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA). Overall, PLS-DA also showed better accuracy than SIMCA for classifying genuine and adulterated milk, with 100% predictive accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for whole and skim milk. Despite demonstrating suitable classification (>80%) of genuine and adulterated milk, it was not possible to classify the samples according to the level of adulteration.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.