Abstract
The mechanism by which faults interact each other is still a debated matter. One of the main issues is the role of pore-pressure diffusion in the delayed triggering of successive events. The 2016 Amatrice-Visso-Norcia seismic sequence (Central Apennines, Italy) provides a suitable dataset to test different physical mechanisms leading to delayed events. The sequence started on August 24, 2016, with the Amatrice mainshock (MW = 6), and was followed after more than 60 days by events in Visso (MW = 5.4) and Norcia (MW = 5.9). We analysed the contribution of the static stress change and the role of fluids in the delayed triggering. Through 3D poroelastic modelling, we show that the Amatrice mainshock induced a pore-pressure diffusion and a normal stress reduction in the hypocentral area of the two aftershocks, favouring the rupture. Our parametric study employs a simple two-layered conductivity model with anisotropy in the seismogenic layer, characterized by larger conductivity values (K>10-5 m/s) along the NNW-SSE direction. The one-way coupled pore-pressure 3-D diffusion modelling predicts the maximum increase of the pore pressure at the location of the two Visso earthquakes 60 days after the mainshock. The occurrence of anisotropic diffusivity is supported by the pattern of active faults and the strong crustal anisotropy documented by S-wave splitting analysis. We conclude that the temporal evolution of the sequence was controlled by the anisotropic diffusion of pore-pressure perturbations through pre-existing NNW-trending fracture systems.
Highlights
Understanding physical mechanisms by which faults interact is crucial for mitigating earthquakes impact, on highly exposed regions
We have investigated the delayed triggering of the two large aftershocks of the August 24, 2016, Amatrice, MW = 6.0, earthquake occurred near Visso after 62 days and about 2 h apart
The Coulomb stress transfer analysis indicates that the two aftershocks are located in a positively stressed area ( CFF > 0) but it cannot account for the time delay
Summary
Coulomb static stress transfer due to the Amatrice event did not instantaneously trigger the two large Visso aftershocks. Pore pressure diffusion, initiated with the deformation of the Amatrice mainshock, triggered the two Visso aftershocks. Anisotropic conductivity modelling is mandatory for pore pressure diffusion computation in central Apennines
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
