Abstract

Our survey shows an extreme variability among centers in terms of use of fluid restriction as a prophylactic tool but also in terms of its use (both opportunity and modality) when a hemodynamically significant PDA is diagnosed. This variability, that can be also found in randomized trials and observational studies, suggests that further evidence is needed to better understand its potential beneficial effects and its potential harms such as dehydration, hypotension, decreased end-organ perfusion, and reduced caloric intake. • The lack of demonstrable improvement following the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus has recently paved the way to a more conservative approach. • Fluid restriction is the most commonly applied conservative treatment of PDA. • Among Italian NICUs an extreme variability in terms of indications, timing and modalities of application of Fluid restriction can be found. • This variability reflects the lack of standardization of this practice and the contrasting evidence on its efficacy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call