Abstract

Characterizing many species interactions as mutualisms can be misleading because some members of the interaction derive greater fitness benefits at the expense of other members. We provide detailed natural history data on a suspected bird–plant mutualism in South Africa where many species of birds use fluffy Eriocephalus seed material to construct their nests, potentially dispersing seeds for the plant. We focus on a common bird, Prinia maculosa, which invests heavily in gathering Eriocephalus material. Prinias spent 5 of their median 6-day nest construction period adding seed material to their nests and frequently travelled outside their territory boundary to gather Eriocephalus material. Yet, prinias gathered primarily Eriocephalus fluff and actively avoided gathering seeds. The average prinia nest contained only 6.6 seeds, but contained fluff from 579 seeds. These data suggest that prinias provide limited dispersal benefits to Eriocephalus plants. By contrast, the large amounts of Eriocephalus fluff in prinia nests, and the effort that prinias invest in gathering it, suggest that prinias benefit from constructing their nests with Eriocephalus material. We end by outlining hypotheses for possible fitness benefits that Eriocephalus material could provide prinias and other birds.

Highlights

  • Mutualisms—interspecific interactions that benefit both species— play an important role in ecological communities and in shaping the evolutionary trajectories of interacting species [1,2]

  • The interaction between birds and Eriocephalus is likely not a simple mutualism because the fitness outcomes for plants appear to depend on the species of birds gathering seed material

  • Karoo prinias actively avoided seeds when gathering Eriocephalus fluff, and dispersed very few seeds relative to the amount of fluff used in their nests

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mutualisms—interspecific interactions that benefit both species— play an important role in ecological communities and in shaping the evolutionary trajectories of interacting species [1,2]. Fitness outcomes of mutualisms can vary across space and time, depending on trait values of local species [7] and the community context where the interaction occurs [8]. Changes in the community composition can alter the nature of mutualistic interactions, changing selective pressures on interacting species [9] or leading to the breakdown of.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call