Abstract

Irreversibility is usually captured by a comparison between the process that happens and a corresponding “reverse process.” In the last decades, this comparison has been extensively studied through fluctuation relations. Here, we revisit fluctuation relations from the standpoint, suggested decades ago by Watanabe, that the comparison should involve the prediction and the retrodiction on the unique process, rather than two processes. We identify a necessary and sufficient condition for a retrodictive reading of a fluctuation relation. The retrodictive narrative also brings to the fore the possibility of deriving fluctuation relations based on various statistical divergences, and clarifies some of the traditional assumptions as arising from the choice of a reference prior.

Highlights

  • In the pursuit of this line of research, we recognize that our previous paper was not radical enough

  • The retrodictive narrative brings to the fore the possibility of deriving fluctuation relations based on various statistical divergences, and clarifies some of the traditional assumptions as arising from the choice of a reference prior

  • We compare the fluctuation relations obtained in the retrodictive narrative with those obtained in the reverse-process narrative

Read more

Summary

PROCESSES VERSUS INFERENCES

Quantitative approaches to irreversibility traditionally involve a comparison between the process physically happening, usually called forward process, and a corresponding reverse (or backward) process. We proposed to define the reverse process in terms of Bayesian retrodiction. The replacement of irreversibility with irretrodictability was pioneered by Watanabe, though prior to our previous work no connection had been drawn with the fluctuation theorems derived in the last twenty years. Under this change of viewpoint, it is the same physics that is being described, freed from an excess baggage in the narrative (and possibly, on the interpretation). We have adopted a compact approach to references: besides those that prove specific results, we shall cite mostly reference books and reviews, and occasionally a few works that we consider clear and exemplary, useful as entry points for the reader, without any expectation of being exhaustive

RETRODICTION
Bayesian retrodiction on classical information
Two remarks
Retrodiction on “quantum-inside” classical channels
Case study
The following three statements are equivalent:
Classical one-bit channels
FLUCTUATION RELATIONS FROM RETRODICTION
The process and its statistics
Derivation of the fluctuation relations
Comparison between retrodiction and reverse process
Fluctuation relations and Bayesian retrodiction
Result
ON THE CHOICE OF THE REFERENCE PRIOR
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
Conflict of interest

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.