Abstract
AbstractOne of Malinowski's legacies was a sensitivity to the ways institutions unevenly shape lives and relationships. Taking his lead, this article develops an approach to the formal economy, combining, sharpening, and extending theories of state and market infrastructures in political and economic anthropology. Focusing on urban South Africa, it examines property inheritance among the black majority previously excluded from property rights. As a lens on the formal economy, this moves beyond production to consider how social reproduction – passing on property – weaves through disjointed state processes. The article argues that the formal economy is sustained by particular performances of its scripts: different actors connect fragments of process in their own projects, with little commitment to the official logics that notionally make systems. In a setting where state responsibility over inheritance has expanded, formality's advancing frontiers throw its fluctuating character into relief: institutions’ apparently coherent abstractions are given force in piecemeal fashion.
Highlights
One of Malinowski’s legacies was a sensitivity to the ways institutions unevenly shape lives and relationships
Even in the heyday of formal employment, much state mediation of economic life happened beyond the world of production, in processes of social reproduction
Taking urban South Africa as a case study,1 this article develops an approach to the formal economy that extends anthropology’s insights about state and market infrastructures into people’s concerns with homes, kinship, and providing for the generation
Summary
One of Malinowski’s legacies was a sensitivity to the ways institutions unevenly shape lives and relationships Taking his lead, this article develops an approach to the formal economy, combining, sharpening, and extending theories of state and market infrastructures in political and economic anthropology. Taking urban South Africa as a case study, this article develops an approach to the formal economy that extends anthropology’s insights about state and market infrastructures into people’s concerns with homes, kinship, and providing for the generation. We should question what the detachment means, and ask what rewiring through formal process looks like This means attending not just to how formal rules are underpinned by informal practice, and to how the two constitute each other.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
