Fluconazole vs. voriconazole prophylaxis for prevention of invasive fungal infections post haploidentical stem cell transplant.

Abstract

e19504 Background: IFIs are one of the most detrimental complications of profound and prolonged neutropenia post-allogeneic SCT. Prophylaxis with broad spectrum azole antifungals has become standard of care given favorable outcomes associated with their use in this setting. Nonetheless, the choice of antifungal agent varies between institutions due to absence of consensus guidelines in patients undergoing haploidentical SCT. Methods: Non-interventional retrospective study seeking to compare efficacy of fluconazole vs. voriconazole for prevention of IFI post haploidentical SCT for hematologic malignancies. SCT databases at two academic insitutions (one uses fluconazole and other uses voriconazole) were queried to identify patients who underwent allogeneic SCT from April 2012 until March 2018, and received prophlaxis with either voriconazole (group I) or fluconazole (group II). Patients with intent to start prophylaxis with fluconazole or voriconazole were included, even if antifungal agent was changed later. Primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of breakthrough IFIs (based on MSG criteria) on day +100 and +180. Fisher exact test was used to compare rates of breakthrough IFIs between two cohorts. Secondary endpoint was overal survival (OS). Kaplan Meiers analysis was performed to compare OS on day +180 and 1-year post SCT. Results: The cohort included 141 patients (group I: 75 and group II: 66). Percentage of patients who underwent transplant for leukemia was higher in group I compared to group II (77.3% vs. 56.1%, p < 0.001). A haploidentical SCT was performed in 62.7% of patients in group I compared to 100% in group II (p < 0.001). All patients received non-myeloablative conditioning. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of IFIs between two groups on day +100 (0% in I vs. 4.5% in II, p = 0.9) and +180 (1.4% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.2). A significant difference in OS was noted on day +180 and at 1-year in univariate analysis (Table). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that prophylactic use of either voriconazole or fluconazole after haploidentical SCT is associated with low rates of IFIs. However, survival data favored voriconazole over fluconazole. [Table: see text]