Fluconazole is as effective as other anti-mold agents in preventing early invasive fungal disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: assessment of antifungal therapy in haematological disease in China.

Abstract

BackgroundThe introduction of mold-active antifungal drugs has led clinicians to reconsider the use of fluconazole for preventing invasive fungal disease (IFD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In this study of recipients of allo-HSCT, we evaluated the effects of different antifungal prophylaxes on the incidence of IFD at different times after transplantation.MethodsAmong the 1,401 patients registered in the prospective China Assessment of Antifungal Therapy in Haematological Disease (CAESAR) study database, there were 661 eligible patients who received primary antifungal prophylaxis. The incidence of IFD at different times after transplantation (early, late, and very late) and overall survival were compared for patients who received different drugs.ResultsThe overall incidence of probable IFD was 7.0% in the fluconazole group, 12.6% in the itraconazole group, 1.4% in the voriconazole group, and 5.2% in the micafungin group (P=0.0379). However, the four groups had no significant differences in early, late, or very late IFD. The risk factors associated with IFD were neutropenia for more than 14 days, age greater than 18 years, and receipt of transplantation from an alternative (unrelated and haploidentical) donor (P<0.05). Sub-group analysis of alternative donors indicated that the efficacy of fluconazole was similar to the other three drugs in preventing early IFD.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the efficacy of fluconazole is similar to that of mold-active drugs in preventing early IFD in HSCT patients, even in high-risk patients receiving transplantation from alternative donors. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.