Fluconazole and amphotericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method compared with E-test and semiautomated broth microdilution test.

Abstract

A comparative study of fluconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing was performed with 68 clinical Candida species isolates and three test methods. The methods used were an agar diffusion method (E-test) and two broth dilution methods, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) reference broth macrodilution method and an in-house-prepared semiautomated broth microdilution method based on the Bioscreen turbidometer. In the microdilution method, growth of the yeasts was measured continuously by the automatic turbidometer (Bioscreen), which permitted precise and objective determination of endpoints. MIC endpoints were read after 24 h for the microdilution method and the E-test. Amphotericin B susceptibility testing with the NCCLS method and the E-test yielded comparable results in 89% of the tests, meaning that the endpoints obtained were identical or differed by no more than 2 twofold dilutions. The NCCLS and broth microdilution tests scored 97% comparable results, and the E-test and the broth microdilution test yielded 90% comparable results. Fluconazole susceptibility testing produced 96% comparable results with the NCCLS test and the E-test, 100% comparable results with the NCCLS and the microdilution methods, and 98.5% comparable results with the microdilution method and the E-test. We conclude that the E-test and the Bioscreen microdilution method are valuable alternatives to the NCCLS reference method for routine susceptibility testing of Candida species with fluconazole and amphotericin B.