Abstract

It is well known that fluid mechanical forces directly impact endothelial signaling pathways. But while this general observation is clear, less apparent are the underlying mechanisms that initiate these critical signaling processes. This is because fluid mechanical forces can offer a direct mechanical input to possible mechanotransducers as well as alter critical mass transport characteristics (i.e., concentration gradients) of a host of chemical stimuli present in the blood stream. However, it has recently been accepted that mechanotransduction (direct mechanical force input), and not mass transfer, is the fundamental mechanism for many hemodynamic force-modulated endothelial signaling pathways and their downstream gene products. This conclusion has been largely based, indirectly, on accepted criteria that correlate signaling behavior and shear rate and shear stress, relative to changes in viscosity. However, in this work, we investigate the negative control for these criteria. Here we computationally and experimentally subject mass-transfer limited systems, independent of mechanotransduction, to the purported criteria. The results showed that the negative control (mass-transfer limited system) produced the same trends that have been used to identify mechanotransduction-dominant systems. Thus, the widely used viscosity-related shear stress and shear rate criteria are insufficient in determining mechanotransduction-dominant systems. Thus, research should continue to consider the importance of mass transfer in triggering signaling cascades.

Highlights

  • Understanding the mechanistic behavior of endothelial signaling pathways is crucial to the search for therapeutic drug delivery targeting vascular diseases

  • A fundamental interest in the mechanism of signaling processes in the endothelium due to fluid mechanics, whether mechanotransduction, mass transfer or both remains an important topic of interest [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]

  • Viscosity-Independent Shear Stress Results Using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and species mass balance as described in Materials and Methods, we show that a mass-transfer limited model follows the same trends as observed by others who deduced that similar trends indicated mechanotransduction [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the mechanistic behavior of endothelial signaling pathways is crucial to the search for therapeutic drug delivery targeting vascular diseases. In order to develop an inferential method for determining the importance of mechanotransduction and mass transfer in endothelial signaling processes, Ando et al (1988) used viscosityrelated tangential flow studies to evaluate signaling results as compared to fluid shear rate and shear stress. While the authors performed both mathematical order-of-magnitude analysis and experiments to arrive at this conclusion, they did not discuss negative controls (i.e., the possibility of not having mechanotransducers or mass transfer) These criteria have been used to conclude the mechanism of fluid mechanical forces on a number of signaling processes [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Further hemodynamic flow has been correlated to endothelial vasoactive agents [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76]

Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.