Abstract

The flow field around supersonic aircraft is usually accompanied by complex flow phenomena, such as shock wave and shock wave/boundary layer interaction, which cause some adverse effects on aircraft performance. Seeking effective flow control methods has been a hot topic for many researchers. As an important method to improve the flow characteristics in supersonic flows, micro jet technology and its control mechanism have been paid much attention. In this article, we used compression corner calculation model and conducted detailed numerical investigations in the supersonic flow field with different injection pressure ratios, various actuation positions, and different nozzle types. The interaction between the micro jets and supersonic upstream flows generates complex flow structures, which contain bow shocks, barrel shocks, Mach disk, counter-rotating vortex pairs, and so on. The flow characteristics with micro jet schemes are superior to those in the no-control case. The controlling performance of micro jet is mainly determined by the following aspects. First, the downwash effect of counter-rotating vortex pairs can bring high-energy fluid into the bottom of the boundary layer to activate low-energy fluid and then strengthen the ability of resisting the flow separations. Second, the bow shock, which is generated upstream of the micro jet, significantly decelerates the downstream flows. Thus, the shock intensity at the corner is weakened and the characteristic of shock wave/boundary layer interaction is improved. In addition, the effective function range of MJ, that is, the distance between the counter-rotating vortex pair and the wall surface, is also an important factor. When both the counter-rotating vortex pairs and the bow shock are further from the wall, the flow characteristics around the corner in a larger area can be improved. Research shows that the micro jet scheme with Laval nozzle gives better controlling effect on shock wave/boundary layer interaction when the injection pressure radio is set to be 0.6, with the actuation location being 20 times the jet outlet diameter upstream of the corner.

Highlights

  • Shock wave/boundary layer interaction (SWBLI) exists in the flow field of transonic, supersonic, and hypersonic aircrafts

  • This article focuses on the flow control mechanism of micro jet (MJ) in supersonic compression corner flow field

  • The resulting bow shock wave leads to larger adverse pressure gradient, causing flow separation I in the upstream area of MJ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shock wave/boundary layer interaction (SWBLI) exists in the flow field of transonic, supersonic, and hypersonic aircrafts. Case 4, which responds to the higher injection pressure ratio, the strongest expansion, and the obstruction effect on the mainstream, leads to a larger distance from interaction boundary to wall relative to other cases, resulting in a larger function range on the mainstream.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call