Flow analysis of the bileaflet mechanical prosthetic heart valves using laser Doppler anemometer: Effect of the valve designs and installed orientations to the flow inside the simulated left ventricle

Abstract

Ever since the first introduction of the ball-type valve by Hufnagel in 1952, which was installed in the descending aorta to correct aortic valve insufficiency, great efforts have been aimed to produce a hemodynamically and structurally superior prosthetic heart valve. Bileaflet valves, commercially initiated by the St. Jude medical (SJM) valve, perform satisfactorily, and now the majority of the mechanical-type prosthetic heart valves used clinically are of this type. The recent trend in bileaflet valve design seems to be concentrated on the hinge mechanism and leaflet design to improve performance against thromboembolic complications and hemolysis. This paper studied the effects of hinge location, leaflet configuration, valve opening angle, and valve installed orientation to the flow field inside the simulated ventricle using laser Doppler anemometry. As a model prosthetic valve, the SJM valve was selected as a reference, and newer bileaflet valves, including the ATS, the Carbomedics (CM), and the Jyros (JR) valves, were selected for comparison. The test program also utilized a flow visualization technique to map the velocity field inside the simulated ventricle to complement the information obtained using the LDA system. Comparison of the velocity profiles at corresponding flow phases revealed the effects of the differences in valve design and orientation. Based on precise examination of the data, the following general conclusions can be made: all valves (SJM, ATS, CM, and JR) show distinct circulatory flow patterns when the valve is installed in the antianatomical orientation. The small differences in hinge location and leaflet configuration can generate noticeable differences, particularly during the accelerating flow phase of the valve. The ATS and the CM valves open less during the forward flow phase, and this results in generally diverse and less distinct flow patterns and slower velocity. This is particularly noticeable for the flow through the central orifice. The SJM valve maintains a relatively higher velocity through the central orifice. The curved leaflet JR valve generates higher but divergent flow during the accelerating and peak flow phases.