FLOT compared to FOLFOX/XELOX as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer: Experience of two clinics.

Abstract

361 Background: The optimal regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial, especially whether triplet (FLOT) or duplet (FOLFOX/XELOX) regimen is superior since escalation does not always lead to significant clinical improvement. The aim of this study is to assess efficacy of triplet and duplet chemotherapy regimens as a neoadjuvant approach in locally advanced GC via retrospective data. Methods: We queried the data for 334 patients with locally advanced GC (cT2-4 or cN+) diagnosed in 2016–2023 yy administered with multi-agent NCT: FLOT or XELOX/FOLFOX. The primary endpoints were the ratio of patients with disease progression on NCT, rates of ypN0, and rates of pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 156 patients (out of total 334 included in the study) received doublet NCT (FOLFOX/XELOX, 8/6 cycles respectively), 61.5% were males, median age was 67.4 (range 21.3-85.4) years, 88.2% had cT3-4. and 22.4% had locally advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. 177 patients were treated with triple NCT (FLOT, 8 cycles), 62.1% were males, median age was 59.9 years, 89.2% had cT3-4, and locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 21.0%. At a median follow up of 34.7 months (mth) using FLOT regimen as NCT was associated with better clinical outcomes. The ratio of patients who have progressed on NCT was 21.5% and 31% in triplet and doublet arms, respectively (p=0.098). Rates of ypN0 were 50.5% in FLOT arm and 43.7% in XELOX/FOLFOX arm (p=0.36). pCR was achieved in 8.2% and 6.3% in FLOT and XELOX/FOLFOX arms, respectively (p=0.59). Median PFS was 20.3 mth in FLOT arm in comparison to 15.7 mth in FOLFOX/XELOX arm (p=0.012). Median OS was not reached (NR) for triplet arm and was 25.1 mth for doublet arm (p= 0.003). Patients who conversed resectable disease had median PFS of 34.5 and 23.1 months for FLOT and FOLFOX/XELOX arms, respectively (p=0.024). Median OS in these subgroups was NR and 37.0 mth (p=0.003). Conclusions: We report that triplet regimen (FLOT) in comparison with doublet (FOLFOX/XELOX) regimen is the more favorable option as a neoadjuvant setting in locally advanced gastric cancer. FLOT NCT is associated with increased ypN0, pCR and shows statistically significant difference in PFS and OS.