Abstract

Disasters result from the interactions of hazards and vulnerability conditions. Considering the perspectives of survivors of a disaster event is critical for reducing the progression of vulnerability conditions. The Mbire community in Zimbabwe is facing increasing threats from recurring high- and low-magnitude floods that manifest themselves in the disruption of livelihoods and destruction of crops and infrastructure. This study, therefore, explored the perspectives of flood survivors on vulnerability to floods and examined their vulnerability-reduction measures. Using an interpretivist approach to knowledge generation, a sample of 51 research participants provided data through interviews, a focus group discussion and field observations. Results showed that shortage of land, flood-based farming practices, poverty and climate change, amongst others, are the key drivers of the smallholder farmers’ vulnerability to floods. The most affected groups of people include women, children and the elderly. To reduce their vulnerability, the smallholder farmers mainly rely on traditional flood-proofed structures built on stilts, dual home system and indigenous flood forecasting. The study proposes six policy implications to reduce vulnerability to floods. These include diversifying rural livelihoods beyond the farming sector, investment in irrigation infrastructure, increasing access to financial resources, constructing human settlements away from floodplains, enforcing environmental laws regarding flood-based farming and community education on the long-term negative impacts of recession farming. The implementation of these policy recommendations can contribute to community resilience to flood disasters.

Highlights

  • The term ‘vulnerability’ is widely used in physical as well as social sciences

  • This study investigated the application of these flood-proofing measures in reducing the vulnerability to floods in Mbire district

  • Of the 40 key informants, the majority (50%) opined that the causes of vulnerability to floods in Mbire were rooted in limited access to arable land, whilst 30% blamed their vulnerability on acts of God, ancestral spirits or nature, including climate change/variability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The term ‘vulnerability’ is widely used in physical as well as social sciences. As a result, a dozen scholarly definitions of vulnerability have emerged across disciplines and practices (Kelman et al 2016; Mavhura 2018). To promote a common understanding of vulnerability, the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR 2009) defined vulnerability as the characteristics and circumstances of a community, system or asset that make it susceptible to the damaging effects of a hazard (United Nations 2016) This perspective views vulnerability as the degree to which a system reacts adversely to actual or perceived threat(s) (Gain et al 2015). The fundamental question underlying vulnerability analysis is: ‘How do natural hazards affect a society?’ To answer this question, Armaș and Gavriș (2013) viewed vulnerability as a significant determinant of disasters than hazards themselves They distinguished between social and physical vulnerability. Because many societies live under different social, economic, political, cultural and institutional settings, they have varying levels of vulnerability

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call