Abstract

Abstract. Rainfall-runoff models are crucial tools for the statistical prediction of flash floods and real-time forecasting. This paper focuses on a karstic basin in the South of France and proposes a distributed parsimonious event-based rainfall-runoff model, coherent with the poor knowledge of both evaporative and underground fluxes. The model combines a SCS runoff model and a Lag and Route routing model for each cell of a regular grid mesh. The efficiency of the model is discussed not only to satisfactorily simulate floods but also to get powerful relationships between the initial condition of the model and various predictors of the initial wetness state of the basin, such as the base flow, the Hu2 index from the Meteo-France SIM model and the piezometric levels of the aquifer. The advantage of using meteorological radar rainfall in flood modelling is also assessed. Model calibration proved to be satisfactory by using an hourly time step with Nash criterion values, ranging between 0.66 and 0.94 for eighteen of the twenty-one selected events. The radar rainfall inputs significantly improved the simulations or the assessment of the initial condition of the model for 5 events at the beginning of autumn, mostly in September–October (mean improvement of Nash is 0.09; correction in the initial condition ranges from −205 to 124 mm), but were less efficient for the events at the end of autumn. In this period, the weak vertical extension of the precipitation system and the low altitude of the 0 °C isotherm could affect the efficiency of radar measurements due to the distance between the basin and the radar (~60 km). The model initial condition S is correlated with the three tested predictors (R2 > 0.6). The interpretation of the model suggests that groundwater does not affect the first peaks of the flood, but can strongly impact subsequent peaks in the case of a multi-storm event. Because this kind of model is based on a limited amount of readily available data, it should be suitable for operational applications.

Highlights

  • Rainfall-runoff models are crucial tools for the statistical prediction of flash floods and real-time forecasting

  • The concept of distributed parsimonious event-based rainfall-runoff models appears to be a good way of optimizing the model’s efficiency in catchments where hydrological fluxes and features are poorly known. Such models seem to be rare for flash flood simulation in karstic catchments: it is used by Bailly-Comte et al (2008b) to simulate the Coulazou karstic catchement flash floods

  • Mean Field Bias (MFB) values and determination coefficients Re2 and Rh2 of the linear regression between rain gauges and radar depth Hydram and Calamar were calculated for each rainfall radar event

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rainfall-runoff models are crucial tools for the statistical prediction of flash floods and real-time forecasting. One strategy consists in not taking into account the inter-flood period and using event-based models In this case, the initial wetness state of the catchment has to be assessed from external information such as baseflow (Franchini et al, 1996; Fourmigueand Lavabre, 2005), surface model output (Goodrich et al, 1994; Estupina-Borrell et al, 2005), remote sensing data (Quesney et al, 2000; Pellarin et al, 2006), or in situ measurement of soil water content (Brocca et al, 2008; Tramblay et al, 2010). The concept of distributed parsimonious event-based rainfall-runoff models appears to be a good way of optimizing the model’s efficiency in catchments where hydrological fluxes and features are poorly known Such models seem to be rare for flash flood simulation in karstic catchments: it is used by Bailly-Comte et al (2008b) to simulate the Coulazou karstic catchement flash floods. The initial condition of the model is related to predictors like surface model output, baseflow and piezometric level

Structure of the model
Runoff model
Routing model
Lez catchment
Rainfall and runoff data
Piezometric data
Hu2 soil moisture index
Model calibration
Model error and uncertainties
Contribution of the groundwater to the flood
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call