Abstract

Devastating floods occur regularly around the world. Recently, machine learning models have been used for flood susceptibility mapping. However, even when these algorithms are provided with adequate ground truth training samples, they can fail to predict flood extends reliably. On the other hand, the height above nearest drainage (HAND) model can produce flood prediction maps with limited accuracy. The objective of this research is to produce an accurate and dynamic flood modeling technique to produce flood maps as a function of water level by combining the HAND model and machine learning. In this paper, the HAND model was utilized to generate a preliminary flood map; then, the predictions of the HAND model were used to produce pseudo training samples for a R.F. model. To improve the R.F. training stage, five of the most effective flood mapping conditioning factors are used, namely, Altitude, Slope, Aspect, Distance from River and Land use/cover map. In this approach, the R.F. model is trained to dynamically estimate the flood extent with the pseudo training points acquired from the HAND model. However, due to the limited accuracy of the HAND model, a random sample consensus (RANSAC) method was used to detect outliers. The accuracy of the proposed model for flood extent prediction, was tested on different flood events in the city of Fredericton, NB, Canada in 2014, 2016, 2018, 2019. Furthermore, to ensure that the proposed model can produce accurate flood maps in other areas as well, it was also tested on the 2019 flood in Gatineau, QC, Canada. Accuracy assessment metrics, such as overall accuracy, Cohen’s kappa coefficient, Matthews correlation coefficient, true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), false positive rate (FPR) and false negative rate (FNR), were used to compare the predicted flood extent of the study areas, to the extent estimated by the HAND model and the extent imaged by Sentinel-2 and Landsat satellites. The results confirm that the proposed model can improve the flood extent prediction of the HAND model without using any ground truth training data.

Highlights

  • Floods are a devastating natural hazard but are inadequately understood [1] and controlled [2]

  • To ensure that the proposed model can produce accurate flood maps in other areas as well, it was tested on the 2019 flood in Gatineau, QC, Canada. Accuracy assessment metrics, such as overall accuracy, Cohen’s kappa coefficient, Matthews correlation coefficient, true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), false positive rate (FPR) and false negative rate (FNR), were used to compare the predicted flood extent of the study areas, to the extent estimated by the height above nearest drainage (HAND) model and the extent imaged by Sentinel-2 and Landsat satellites

  • To overcome the problems of machine learning mentioned above, we proposed in this paper a new flood prediction model called Pseudo Supervised Random Forest (PS-random forest (RF))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floods are a devastating natural hazard but are inadequately understood [1] and controlled [2]. (1) Hydrodynamic models use mathematical equations to simulate fluid motion and usually require high computational power [22]. These models require significant data inputs such as flow discharge, water depth, gravitational acceleration and channel bed slope, to simulate flow in their attempt to replicate flow patterns and estimate flow velocity and spatial extents of inundation. 3D hydrodynamic models generate a complex three-dimensional representation of floodplain which is usually regarded unnecessary because of their extensive required parameters and maybe comparable accuracy with 2D models [22]. The higher dimensionality of a model, the more parameters required for flood simulation and longer computation time. Hydrodynamic models are extremely complex, have sensitive outputs based on site-specific parameters, require a substantial amount of data and their calibration is costly [26]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call