Abstract

The place conditioning paradigm is an efficient, widely-used method to study mechanisms that underlie appetitive or aversive learning and memory processes. However, pharmacological agents used to induce conditioned place preference (CPP) or aversion (CPA) can per se interfere with learning and memory processing, hence confounding the results. Therefore, non-pharmacological place conditioning procedures are of high importance. Here, we introduce a novel procedure for induction of CPA in mice, by water flooding. We found that pairing a context with immersion in moderately cold shallow water resulted in aversion and avoidance of that context during a place preference test. Importantly, place aversion emerged only when mice experienced the onset of flood during conditioning training, but not when mice were placed in a compartment pre-filled with water. We also found that warm water was not sufficiently aversive to induce CPA. Moreover, CPA was observed after two or three context-flood pairings but not after one or four pairings, suggesting that moderate conditioning intensity produces optimal CPA expression. Thus, flood-induced CPA is a simple, cheap, and efficient procedure to form and measure place aversion memories in mice, using an ethologically-relevant threat.

Highlights

  • Place conditioning procedures in rodents were initially developed to establish spatial avoidance behavior in rodents using γ- and X-rays[1]

  • Place Preference Test was performed 24 h after the last conditioning session, and it was identical to the Baseline Test

  • Place aversion was defined as a decrease in the percent of time spent in the flood-paired compartment during the Place Preference Test, compared to the Baseline Test

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Place conditioning procedures in rodents were initially developed to establish spatial avoidance behavior in rodents using γ- and X-rays[1]. Besides being a relatively simple screening tool for the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse[2,3,4], place conditioning has been used to study appetitive and aversive learning and memory processes[5,6,7], and motivation[8] To this end, conditioning is carried out with drugs that elicit well-established rewarding (e.g., cocaine, amphetamine) or aversive (e.g., lithium chloride, LiCl) effects[3,5,8,9]. When a foot-shock is paired with a neutral stimulus, such as an environmental context, the conditioning process fails to predict neural systems that underlie responses to natural threats[21] This method requires a customized apparatus with electrified grid-floor and shockers, leading to high costs. We took advantage of the mouse natural reluctance to stay in water, to establish a novel non-pharmacological CPA procedure, by pairing a context with the aversive experience of flooding the compartment with shallow water

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call