Abstract
Floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) units increasingly represent a practical and economic means for deep-water oil extraction and production. Systems thinking gives a unique opportunity to seek a balance between FPSO technical performance(s), with whole-cost; stakeholder decision-making is charged to align different fit-for-use design specification options’ that address technical-motion(s), with respective life-cycle cost analyses (LCCA). Soft system methodology allows situation based analyses over set periods-of-time by diagnosing the problem-at-hand; namely, assessing the antecedents of life-cycle cost relative to FPSO sub-component design alternatives. Alternative mooring- component comparisons for either new-build hulls or refurbished hulls represent an initial necessary consideration to facilitate extraction, production and storage of deep-water oil reserves. Coupled dynamic analysis has been performed to generate FPSO motion in six degrees of freedom using SESAM DeepC, while life-cycle cost analysis (LCAA) studies give net-present-value comparisons reflective of market conditions. A parametric study has been conducted by varying wave heights from 4 – 8 m to understand FPSO motion behavior in the presence of wind and current, as well as comparing the motions of turreted versus spread mooring design alternatives. LCCA data has been generated to compare the cost of such different mooring options/hull conditions over 10 and 25-year periods. Systems thinking has been used to explain the interaction of problem variables; resultantly this paper is able to identify explicit factors affecting the choice of FPSO configurations in terms of motion <i>and</i> whole-cost, toward assisting significantly with the front-end engineering design (FEED) phase of fit-for-purpose configured FPSOs, in waters off Malaysia and Australia.
Highlights
Floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) units are increasingly the oil and gas industry’s preferred deepwater oil-extraction platforms
Motion and cost performance (Fig. 2), factors to consider in choosing an efficient FPSO design required a parametric
The primary objective of this paper sought to clarify the antecedents of front end engineering design (FEED) factors contributing to the selection of an efficient FPSO based on whole-cost and motion
Summary
Floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) units are increasingly the oil and gas industry’s preferred deepwater oil-extraction platforms. Feasibility studies for a FPSO project must necessarily involve motion performance analyses, as well as, ideally, cost-comparisons of such hull condition and mooring system alternatives. Design engineers are uncertain of the extent to which whole-cost knowledge applications might influence respective fit-for-use options’ comparisons. This confusion lends itself to a soft-systems methodology which can be argued as able to help stakeholders toward a holistic approach that combines a philosophical-what with a technical-how (Checkland, 1981). Problem analyses here must embrace both a cost effective and a best-performing FPSO design. Confusion arises over (weighted) interdependence considerations; in this case, coupled dynamic analyses of six FPSO motions (yaw/heave/pitch/sway/roll/surge, as shown in Fig. 1) require examination alongside, FPSOs LCCA comparisons of new-build/converted hull(s) and
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
