Abstract

This research focused on furthering the current understanding of the flowfield inside a cavity under typical flight conditions. The flight envelope included altitudes of up to 40,000 ft and maximum Mach number of 1.28 and included several test points between Mach 0.9 and 1.1, which are challenging to isolate in wind tunnel testing due to tunnel wall interference. The pod was instrumented to collect aeroacoustic pressures and qualitative flowfield imaging for a cavity with a length-to-depth ratio of four. Test missions were flown with several different passive flow control configurations, and their respective effect on acoustic properties and flow patterns were collected. Flow control comprising a rod-in-a-crossflow or a traditional sawtooth spoiler was generally found to reduce sound pressure level, though the extent of effectiveness varied with flight condition. The flow control devices installed at or below the cavity exit plane were found to have little influence. Tuft-based flow visualization complemented the effort, for one example, by demonstrating the outward flow near the cavity lip for the sawtooth spoiler.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call