Abstract

Globally, wilderness is being converted for rural and agricultural land use. In countryside landscapes, many habitat structures remain intact, providing suitable habitat for wildlife species that can accurately assess novel risks and develop tolerance to benign disturbances. Associative learning that promotes avoidance and also facilitates desensitization to benign disturbance is key to persisting in these landscapes. Conversely, learning to distinguish and avoid negative interactions with humans, like hunting, is vital. To determine if eastern gray kangaroos are capable of learning from previous interactions with humans, we tested the flight responses of wild kangaroos which have previously experienced either low or high frequencies of harmful and benign encounters with humans. We found that eastern gray kangaroos rapidly habituated to benign disturbance as there was no significant difference in assessment distance between groups that previously experienced low or high frequencies of disturbance. The threat of harmful disturbances was not as quickly learnt, as groups that experienced low frequencies of harmful disturbance delayed flight longer than those experiencing frequent harm. We found that the influence of environmental and group parameters on a kangaroo's decision to flee depended on the intent and frequency of previous interactions with humans. Our study indicates that kangaroos are learning from previous encounters with humans, correctly assessing novel risks which may be contributing to their persistence in countryside landscapes.

Highlights

  • Humans present a complex mix of negative and beneficial circum‐ stances for many wildlife species

  • Kangaroos formed larger groups when far from cover, following the “Many Eyes Hypothesis” (Ale & Brown, 2007; Beauchamp, 2013), but this relationship was not detectable under harmful conditions as group size did not change with distance to cover. This response was hypothesized as a behavioral adaption to human hunting as individ‐ uals learnt that forming large groups far from cover may make them targets for hunters (Austin & Ramp, 2019)

  • We examined AsD using a generalized linear mixed model to detect significant differences between our four disturbance types (High Benign, Low Benign, Low Harm, and High Harm), with inference determined using likelihood ratio tests

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Humans present a complex mix of negative and beneficial circum‐ stances for many wildlife species. For large mammals (>15 kg), evidence suggest many are resil‐ ient to minor modification of habitat in the countryside but com‐ monly exhibit behavioral changes to avoid direct interactions with humans (Daily et al, 2003; Lawrence, 2008; Zhou et al, 2013) For these “avoiders,” encounters with humans are often perceived as threatening regardless of their intent or actions (Frid & Dill, 2002). Kangaroos formed larger groups when far from cover, following the “Many Eyes Hypothesis” (Ale & Brown, 2007; Beauchamp, 2013), but this relationship was not detectable under harmful conditions as group size did not change with distance to cover This response was hypothesized as a behavioral adaption to human hunting as individ‐ uals learnt that forming large groups far from cover may make them targets for hunters (Austin & Ramp, 2019). The study area was comprised of 4% HB, 47% LB, 21% LH, and 28% HH

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call