Abstract

The paper presents an approach to solving the problem of aircraft flight safety. External threats in the form of aircraft-offenders are considered. The algorithm of collision danger coefficients with aircraft-offenders is presented, оn the basis of which the side-program manager of flight safety monitoring is formed. Two danger coefficients in the horizontal and vertical planes are introduced. Based on various flight situations four possible decisions are offered: absence of any aircraft activity, flight level change, deviation in the horizontal plane and both in vertical and horizontal planes. For each case the formulas of double evaluation are received. They take into account different parameters of aircraft relative motion. Based on these estimates it is possible to build a final expert evaluation for the considered flight situations. It is implemented in the onboard program-manager. The structure of the program is presented. At the program-manager output the expected minimized risk evaluation and the selected alternative of the avoidance of aircraft from the meeting point are formed. The paper presents a detailed description of the procedures to test the performance of the program-manager algorithms. The initial conditions for different flight situations are provided. The simulation results of the algorithm are given. The danger coefficients comparison when performing maneuvers to prevent dangerous approach and in their absence is illustrated. It is shown that the maneuver implementation recommended by program-manager algorithms decreases the resulting danger coefficient. Particular attention was paid to aircraft landing, especially if the landing area had several conflicting aircraft.

Highlights

  • The paper presents an approach to solving the problem of aircraft flight safety

  • For each case the formulas of double evaluation are received. They take into account different parameters of aircraft relative motion

  • Based on these estimates it is possible to build a final expert evaluation for the considered flight situations. It is implemented in the onboard program-manager

Read more

Summary

Pɜ Pɝ

Ⱥɧɚɥɢɡ ɜɫɟɯ ɩɟɪɟɱɢɫɥɟɧɧɵɯ ɫɥɭɱɚɟɜ ɩɨɡɜɨɥɢɥ ɫɮɨɪɦɢɪɨɜɚɬɶ ɚɥɝɨɪɢɬɦ ɩɪɟɞɭɩɪɟɠɞɟɧɢɹ ɢ ɩɪɟɞɨɬɜɪɚɳɟɧɢɹ ɭɝɪɨɡɵ ɫɬɨɥɤɧɨɜɟɧɢɹ ɫ ɞɪɭɝɢɦ ȼɋ, ɛɥɨɤ-ɫɯɟɦɵ ɤɨɬɨɪɨɝɨ ɩɪɟɞɫɬɚɜɥɟɧɵ ɧɚ ɪɢɫ. Ȼɥɨɤ 1 ɡɚɩɪɟɬɚ ɨɰɟɧɤɢ ɨɩɚɫɧɨɫɬɢ ɩɪɢ ɩɨɥɟɬɟ ɧɚ ɨɞɧɨɣ ɜɵɫɨɬɟ ɧɟɬ ǻȥ >180 ɧɟɬ ɞɚ ɞɚ ǻȥ =180+2ij ɧɟɬ ɞɚ. Ȼɥɨɤ 2 ɡɚɩɪɟɬɚ ɨɰɟɧɤɢ ɨɩɚɫɧɨɫɬɢ ɩɪɢ ɷɲɟɥɨɧɢɪɨɜɚɧɢɢ ɜɵɫɨɬɵ ɧɟɬ ǻh >180 ɧɟɬ ɞɚ ɞɚ ǻ h=180+2q ɧɟɬ ɞɚ R0 > X ɧɟɬ ɞɚ R0 < 0 ȼɵɱɢɫɥɢɬɶ hk ɩɨ ɮɨɪɦɭɥɟ (10). Ȼɥɨɤ 4 ɜɵɛɨɪɚ ɧɚɢɦɟɧɟɟ ɨɩɚɫɧɨɣ ɚɥɶɬɟɪɧɚɬɢɜɵ ɩɪɟɞɨɬɜɪɚɳɟɧɢɹ ɭɝɪɨɡɵ (ɫ) Ɋɢɫ. 2. Ȼɥɨɤ-ɫɯɟɦɚ ɚɥɝɨɪɢɬɦɚ ɞɥɹ ɜɵɱɢɫɥɟɧɢɹ ɤɨɷɮɮɢɰɢɟɧɬɨɜ ɨɩɚɫɧɨɫɬɢ ɫɛɥɢɠɟɧɢɹ ɫ ɞɪɭɝɢɦɢ ȼɋ ɩɪɢ ɡɚɯɨɞɟ ɧɚ ɩɨɫɚɞɤɭ, ɧɚ ɷɬɚɩɟ ɩɪɟɞɭɩɪɟɠɞɟɧɢɹ ɢ ɜɵɛɨɪɚ ɚɥɶɬɟɪɧɚɬɢɜɵ ɭɤɥɨɧɟɧɢɹ, ɧɚ ɷɬɚɩɟ ɩɪɟɞɨɬɜɪɚɳɟɧɢɹ ɭɝɪɨɡɵ. Ⱦɥɹ ɢɧɬɟɝɪɚɥɶɧɨɣ ɨɰɟɧɤɢ ɨɩɚɫɧɨɫɬɢ ɜɨɡɧɢɤɧɨɜɟɧɢɹ ɧɟɫɤɨɥɶɤɢɯ ɜɨɡɞɭɲɧɵɯ ɭɝɪɨɡ ɜ ɞɚɧɧɨɣ ɪɚɛɨɬɟ ɩɪɟɞɥɨɠɟɧɨ ɢɫɩɨɥɶɡɨɜɚɬɶ ɫɩɟɰɢɚɥɶɧɭɸ ɛɨɪɬɨɜɭɸ ɩɪɨɝɪɚɦɦɭ-ɞɢɫɩɟɬɱɟɪ. Ȿɺ ɨɛɳɚɹ ɫɬɪɭɤɬɭɪɚ, ɩɨɤɚɡɚɧɧɚɹ ɧɚ ɪɢɫ. 3, ɫɨɞɟɪɠɢɬ ɫɨɜɨɤɭɩɧɨɫɬɶ ɱɚɫɬɧɵɯ ɚɥɝɨɪɢɬɦɨɜ ɩɪɟɞɭɩɪɟɠɞɟɧɢɹ ɭɝɪɨɡ, ɢɦɟɸɳɢɯ ɧɚ ɫɜɨɟɦ ɜɵɯɨɞɟ ɨɬɜɟɬɵ ɩɨɞɨɛɧɨɝɨ ɫɨɞɟɪɠɚɧɢɹ – ɨɰɟɧɤɭ ɜɟɥɢɱɢɧɵ ɨɠɢɞɚɟɦɨɝɨ, ɦɢɧɢɦɢɡɢɪɭɟɦɨɝɨ ɪɢɫɤɚ ɢ ɜɵɛɪɚɧɧɭɸ ɚɥɶɬɟɪɧɚɬɢɜɭ ɭɤɥɨɧɟɧɢɹ ɨɬ ɬɨɱɤɢ ɜɫɬɪɟɱɢ. ɇɚ ɪɢɫ. 3 – i – ɧɨɦɟɪ ɲɚɝɚ ɩɨ ɜɪɟɦɟɧɢ, m – ɧɨɦɟɪ ɚɧɚɥɢɡɢɪɭɟɦɨɣ ɭɝɪɨɡɵ, j – ɧɨɦɟɪ ɚɥɶɬɟɪɧɚɬɢɜɧɨɝɨ ɫɩɨɫɨɛɚ ɟɟ ɩɪɟɞɨɬɜɪɚɳɟɧɢɹ

Ȼɨɪɬɨɜɚɹ ɂɂɋ Ⱥɜɬɨɩɢɥɨɬ
Ⱦɚɥɟɟ ɪɚɫɫɦɚɬɪɢɜɚɥɫɹ ɫɥɭɱɚɣ ɨɩɚɫɧɨɝɨ ɫɛɥɢɠɟɧɢɹ
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call