Abstract

Federated learning is a distributed learning method that seeks to train a shared global model by aggregating contributions from multiple clients. This method ensures that each client’s local data are not shared with others. However, research has revealed that federated learning is vulnerable to poisoning attacks launched by compromised or malicious clients. Many defense mechanisms have been proposed to mitigate the impact of poisoning attacks, but there are still some limitations and challenges. The defense methods are either performing malicious model removal from the geometric perspective to measure the geometric direction of the model or adding an additional dataset to the server for verifying local models. The former is prone to failure when facing advanced poisoning attacks, while the latter goes against the original intention of federated learning as it requires an independent dataset; thus, both of these defense methods have some limitations. To solve the above problems, we propose a robust federated learning method based on geometric and qualitative metrics (FLGQM). Specifically, FLGQM aims to metricize local models in both geometric and qualitative aspects for comprehensive defense. Firstly, FLGQM evaluates all local models from both direction and size aspects based on similarity calculated by cosine and the Euclidean distance, which we refer to as geometric metrics. Next, we introduce a union client set to assess the quality of all local models by utilizing the union client’s local dataset, referred to as quality metrics. By combining the results of these two metrics, FLGQM is able to use information from multiple views for accurate poisoning attack identification. We conducted experimental evaluations of FLGQM using the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that, under different kinds of poisoning attacks, FLGQM can achieve similar performance to FedAvg in non-adversarial environments. Therefore, FLGQM has better robustness and poisoning attack defense performance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call