Abstract

Geopolymer concrete (GC) is an emerging alternative construction material due to it being eco-friendly in production with considerably low carbon emissions. Despite being an alternative material, the structural behavior of GC is a rarely studied subject in the literature. The studies concerning the mechanical behavior of structural members made from GC have established the foundations of its practical usability. The current structural codes are exclusively for ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPCC), and the utilization of these for GC constitutes an open question. In this study, 12 GC beams with different shear span-to-effective depth ratios of 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 were manufactured and tested in a three-point bending test setup. The effect of the shear reinforcement ratio was also taken into account (0, 0.34, 0.45 and 0.67%). The results were compared with the predictive capabilities of four structural codes and two equations in the literature (all for OPCC). In addition, comparisons were made with a very limited number of studies, which included predictive tools for the strength of GC. All specimens’ cracking moments were calculated with flexural tensile strength predictions and compared with experimental cracking moments. Moreover, particularly for the beams that failed in flexure, the ultimate bending moments were compared with the predictions of two structural codes for OPCC. It was observed that the best predictions of the cracking moment could be made by the equation of Diaz-Loya et al. (2011), which resulted in the lowest coefficient of variation (COV) and consistently predicted on the safe side, whereas, even with a lower COV, EC2 consistently overestimated the cracking moment. For the ultimate moment capacity, it was observed that both ACI318 (2019) and TS500 (2000) delivered relatively good predictions and could be employed confidently.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.