Flexing with lines or pipes: Techno-economic comparison of renewable electricity import options for European research facilities.

Abstract

Where local resources for renewable electricity are scarce or insufficient, long-distance electricity imports will be required in the future. Even across long distances, the variable availability of renewable energy sources needs to be managed for which dedicated storage options are usually considered. Other alternatives could be demand-side flexibility and concentrated solar power with integrated thermal energy storage. Here their influence on the cost of imported electricity is explored. Using a techno-economic linear capacity optimization, exports of renewable electricity from Morocco and Tunisia to CERN in Geneva, Switzerland in the context of large research facilities are modeled. Two different energy supply chains are considered, direct imports of electricity by HVDC transmission lines, and indirect imports using H2 pipelines subsequent electricity generation. The results show that direct electricity exports ranging from 58 EUR/MWh to 106 EUR/MWh are the more economical option compared to indirect H2-based exports ranging from 157 EUR/MWh to 201 EUR/MWh. Both demand-side flexibility and CSP with TES offer significant opportunities to reduce the costs of imports, with demand-side flexibility able to reduce costs for imported electricity by up to 45%. Research institutions in Central Europe could initiate and strengthen electricity export-import partnerships with North Africa to take on a leading role in Europe's energy transition and to secure for themselves a long-term, sustainable electricity supply at plannable costs.