Abstract

Why do incumbent firms frequently reject non-incremental innovations? Beyond technical, structural, or economic factors, we propose an additional factor: the degree of the top management team’s (TMT) frame flexibility, i.e., their capability to perceptually expand an innovation’s categorical boundaries and to cast the innovation as emotionally-resonant with the organization’s identity, competencies, and competitive boundaries. We argue that forces of inertia generally constrict how TMTs perceive innovations, but that frame flexibility can overcome these constraints, increasing the likelihood of adoption and broadening the organization’s innovation practices. We advance a theoretical model that relaxes the assumption that cognitive frames are static, showing how they become flexible via categorical positioning, and introduce a role for emotional frames that appeal to organizational sentiments and aspirations in innovation adoption.

Highlights

  • Prior to going bankrupt in 2010, Blockbuster’s top management team (TMT) framed online streaming, a nonincremental innovation, in ways that conflicted with the company’s legacy strategy as a brickand-mortar video rental service

  • Not all innovations may flourish, we argue that TMTs that build flexible cognitive frames, and couple these frames with emotional engagement, increase the likelihood of non-incremental innovation adoption

  • Gilbert (2006) illustrated how competing cognitive frames of threat and opportunity led to the collapse of several newspapers following the rise of online news. While these empirical cases suggest that cognitive frames may constrain innovation adoption, we argue the reverse: cognitive framing can enable innovation adoption, when the TMT is capable of flexing or stretching the framing

Read more

Summary

Citable link Terms of Use

Ryan, Mary Ann Glynn, and Michael Tushman. "Flexing the Frame: TMT Framing and the Adoption of Non-Incremental Innovations in Incumbent Firms." Harvard Business School Working Paper, No 17-091, April 2017.

Insert Figure About Here
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call