Abstract

SummaryTo manipulate an object skillfully, the brain must learn its dynamics, specifying the mapping between applied force and motion. A fundamental issue in sensorimotor control is whether such dynamics are represented in an extrinsic frame of reference tied to the object or an intrinsic frame of reference linked to the arm. Although previous studies have suggested that objects are represented in arm-centered coordinates [1–6], all of these studies have used objects with unusual and complex dynamics. Thus, it is not known how objects with natural dynamics are represented. Here we show that objects with simple (or familiar) dynamics and those with complex (or unfamiliar) dynamics are represented in object- and arm-centered coordinates, respectively. We also show that objects with simple dynamics are represented with an intermediate coordinate frame when vision of the object is removed. These results indicate that object dynamics can be flexibly represented in different coordinate frames by the brain. We suggest that with experience, the representation of the dynamics of a manipulated object may shift from a coordinate frame tied to the arm toward one that is linked to the object. The additional complexity required to represent dynamics in object-centered coordinates would be economical for familiar objects because such a representation allows object use regardless of the orientation of the object in hand.

Highlights

  • To manipulate an object skilfully, the brain must learn its dynamics, specifying the mapping between applied force and motion

  • All subjects learned the dynamics of the task and generated appropriate compensatory forces on catch trials in the training and transfer positions after learning

  • Performance on transfer trials revealed that when vision was available the dynamics of the straight band generalized mainly in object-centered coordinates whereas the dynamics of the band and pulley were represented primarily in arm-centered coordinates (Figs 2,3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To manipulate an object skilfully, the brain must learn its dynamics, specifying the mapping between applied force and motion. Previous studies have suggested that objects are represented in arm-centered coordinates (Shadmehr and Mussa-Ivaldi, 1994; Bays and Wolpert, 2006), all of these studies have used objects with unusual and complex dynamics. It is not known how objects with natural dynamics are represented. We test the hypothesis that when manipulating a novel object, dynamics are learned in an objectcentered reference frame

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call