Flexible niche partitioning via a foraging mode shift: a proposed mechanism for coexistence in stream‐dwelling charrs

Abstract

Summary1. Foraging behaviour, diet and interference competition were examined for two morphologically similar charrs,Salvelinus malma(Dolly Varden) andS. leucomaenis(white‐spotted charr), under varying food resource conditions over four summers in a Japanese mountain stream. Data were used to test predictions from a mechanistic model of resource partitioning developed from an earlier field experiment.2. The charrs adopted one of two distinct foraging modes, ambushing drifting invertebrates from relatively fixed foraging positions or actively searching for benthic prey over large areas. The proportion of benthos foragers increased markedly when drifting prey declined, and was much greater inS. malmathanS. leucomaeniswhen drift was lean, upholding predictions made from our earlier experiment.3. For drift foragers of both species, frequency of foraging attempts decreased as drift rate declined, and aggressive encounters increased. In contrast, for benthos foragers of both species the frequency of foraging attempts was essentially constant across the range of benthos biomass measured, and aggressive encounters remained low.4. Salvelinus leucomaenisate larger drifting prey thanS. malma, even though the former charr were smaller. In contrast,S. malmaforaged on benthic prey at a higher rate thanS. leucomaenis, although there was no difference in prey mass. Thus, the optimal point to shift to benthic foraging is at a higher drift threshold forS. malmathanS. leucomaenis, most probably due to differences in jaw morphology. Moreover, because dominance for favourable drift foraging positions was based on size alone,S. malmashifted to benthos foraging at a larger size thanS. leucomaenis, as predicted by a simple model.5. Charr consumed distinct prey types according to their foraging mode. Drift foragers primarily ate terrestrial invertebrates, whereas benthos foragers ate mainly chironomid larvae. Consequently, diet overlap was high when drift was abundant and both species were drift foragers, but declined as drift declined andS. malmashifted to benthos foraging. Therefore, species‐specific differences in foraging mode shifts across the resource gradient explained the flexible resource partitioning we observed, and probably account for the coexistence of these congeneric charrs in zones of sympatry in northern Japan.