Abstract

Offspring are selected to demand more resources than what is optimal for their parents to provide, which results in a complex and dynamic interplay during parental care. Parent–offspring communication often involves conspicuous begging by the offspring which triggers a parental response, typically the transfer of food. So begging and parental provisioning reciprocally influence each other and are therefore expected to coevolve. There is indeed empirical evidence for covariation of offspring begging and parental provisioning at the phenotypic level. However, whether this reflects genetic correlations of mean levels of behaviors or a covariation of the slopes of offspring demand and parental supply functions (= behavioral plasticity) is not known. The latter has gone rather unnoticed—despite the obvious dynamics of parent–offspring communication. In this study, we measured parental provisioning and begging behavior at two different hunger levels using canaries (Serinus canaria) as a model species. This enabled us to simultaneously study the plastic responses of the parents and the offspring to changes in offspring need. We first tested whether parent and offspring behaviors covary phenotypically. Then, using a covariance partitioning approach, we estimated whether the covariance predominantly occurred at a between‐nest level (i.e., indicating a fixed strategy) or at a within‐nest level (i.e., reflecting a flexible strategy). We found positive phenotypic covariation of offspring begging and parental provisioning, confirming previous evidence. Yet, this phenotypic covariation was mainly driven by a covariance at the within‐nest level. That is parental and offspring behaviors covary because of a plastic behavioral coadjustment, indicating that behavioral plasticity could be a main driver of parent–offspring coadaptation.

Highlights

  • Parents may extensively provide care to enhance the growth and survival of their offspring, which is a common phenomenon in the animal kingdom (Royle, Smiseth, & Kölliker, 2012)

  • Because of their reciprocal interplay, parental and offspring traits are expected to coadapt which may lead to a genetic correlation

  • Parent–offspring coadaptation is empirically supported by evidence for phenotypic covariation between offspring begging and parental provisioning that has been observed in a number of species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Parents may extensively provide care to enhance the growth and survival of their offspring, which is a common phenomenon in the animal kingdom (Royle, Smiseth, & Kölliker, 2012). FRESNEAU and MÜLLER parents respond to these signals by providing care (e.g., Hussell, 1988; Kilner & Johnstone, 1997; Smiseth, Lennox, & Moore, 2007) Both offspring begging and parental provisioning are costly behaviors (e.g., Mccarty, 1996; Daan, Deerenberg, & Dijkstra, 1996; Tinbergen & Verhulst, 2000; Moreno‐Rueda, 2010; Soler et al, 2014), so that nestlings and parents are selected to optimize their trait expression. The optimal expression of a given behavior strongly depends on the response by the opponent The reciprocity of this interplay and the fact that both traits are heritable (e.g., Kölliker & Richner, 2001; Dor & Lotem, 2009, 2010), makes them the target and agent of selection at the same time (Lock, Smiseth, & Moore, 2004). Empirical evidence for coadaptation, at least at the phenotypic level, has been reported for a number of species (e.g., Kölliker, Brinkhof, & Heeb, 2000; Agrawal, 2001; Hager & Johnstone, 2003; Lock et al, 2004; Hinde, Buchanan, & Kilner, 2009; Estramil, Eens, & Müller, 2013)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call