Abstract

AbstractThrough in-depth analysis of the use ofdet‘it, that’ andså‘then’ occupying the first clausal position (the prefield) in Danish talk-in-interaction, this paper investigates how speakers use highly flexible linguistic elements to their advantage when commencing clauses in real time. These particular words are useful when occupying the prefield, because their flexible nature means that they can be used even when speakers do not have a full format ready for the carrier clause, as long as they have some idea of the interactional purpose of the clause and its information structural prerequisites. The dominating frequency of the most frequent clause openers goes largely unmentioned in previous accounts of the prefield, and the use ofdet‘it, that’ andså‘then’ challenges the popular notion that the textually unmarked prefield is also the grammatical subject of the carrier clause.

Highlights

  • Linell (2005) discusses how the field of linguistics is subject to a WRITTEN LANGUAGE BIAS

  • The present study is part of a larger attempt to counteract this bias by describing the linguistic structure of Danish on the basis of how it is used in spoken discourse, or TALK-IN-INTERACTION – the DanTIN (Danish Talk-in-Interaction) project

  • With a few notable exceptions, Danish grammarians have consistently claimed that non-subject Fs are textually marked

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Linell (2005) discusses how the field of linguistics is subject to a WRITTEN LANGUAGE BIAS This is true of all structural levels of theory and description, but is perhaps the case for grammatical descriptions of languages with a long history of writing, such as Danish. The present study is part of a larger attempt to counteract this bias by describing the linguistic structure of Danish on the basis of how it is used in spoken discourse, or TALK-IN-INTERACTION – the DanTIN (Danish Talk-in-Interaction) project. In addition to providing a general overview of the prefield in talk-in-interaction, this paper focuses on the functional considerations underlying the use of two items which very frequently occur in the prefield: det ‘it, that’, which acts as either a neuter third person pronoun or an expletive subject, and which takes no case marking; and så ‘’, an adverb which has several related meanings in the temporal and modal domains, and happens to be homophonous with the semantically similar conjunction så ‘so’.

Previous descriptions of the prefield
Theoretical framework
Data and methodology
Results
General overview
Expletive function and cataphoric reference
Flexibility of så ‘then’
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.