Abstract

ABSTRACT: This work aims to answer the following question: to what extent is it legal for parties in a Brazilian arbitration to limit the arbitrators powers of analyzing evidence, limiting, for example, which type of evidence is to be admitted. To answer this question, an analysis of the issue is made using the four barriers pointed out by Montoro: public order, binding rules of Law nº 9.307/1996, principles enshrined in art. 21, § 2º, of Law nº 9.307/1996 and constitutional procedural principles. Ultimately, a conclusion is reached in favor of the legality of the hypothesis, but raising doubts regarding the convenience of such an option.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call