Abstract

In this article, the local spatial correlation of multiple remote sensing datasets, such as those from Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and digital surface models (DSMs), are linked to machine learning (ML) regression algorithms for flash floodwater depth retrieval. Edge detection filters are applied to remote sensing images to extract features that are used as independent features by ML algorithms to estimate flood depths. Data of dependent variables were obtained from the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS 2D) simulation model, as applied to the New Cairo, Egypt, post-flash flood event from 24–26 April 2018. Gradient boosting regression (GBR), random forest regression (RFR), linear regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting regression (XGBR), multilayer perceptron neural network regression (MLPR), k-nearest neighbors regression (KNR), and support vector regression (SVR) were used to estimate floodwater depths; their outputs were compared and evaluated for accuracy using the root-mean-square error (RMSE). The RMSE accuracy for all ML algorithms was 0.18–0.22 m for depths less than 1 m (96% of all test data), indicating that ML models are relatively portable and capable of computing floodwater depths using remote sensing data as an input.

Highlights

  • Floodwater depth identification during or after flash flood events is critical in determining hazard degrees and risk zone maps for the economy and human life [1,2]

  • synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data are superior to optical satellite data, as SARs can penetrate cloud cover, they suffer from a long revisit time [5,6,7]

  • The performance of extracted features and their importance in improving accuracy and accelerating the algorithm are investigated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floodwater depth identification during or after flash flood events is critical in determining hazard degrees and risk zone maps for the economy and human life [1,2]. Compared with direct surveying methods, measurement techniques, such as side-scan and multibeam sonar, hydrologic modeling, and flow water depth, based on remote sensing are fast, large-scale, and quasi-synchronous with high spatial resolutions. Direct surveying methods to determine floodwater depth can be extremely precise, but they are greatly influenced by weather conditions and costly, and surveying field crews are not authorized to reach sensitive flooded areas. Optical and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images, and the digital elevation model (DEM) based on airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR), have been integrated and classified for floodwater surface identification [3,4]. SAR data are superior to optical satellite data, as SARs can penetrate cloud cover, they suffer from a long revisit time [5,6,7].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call