Abstract

BackgroundCongenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair is technically challenging with different approaches for repair. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between patch and flap repair. MethodsCDH repairs performed at a quaternary care children's hospital between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Seventy CDH repairs were analyzed after primary repairs were excluded (n = 52). Analysis included proportions or median with interquartile range and chi-square or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. ResultsComparing patch and flap repairs, demographic characteristics and hernia parameters were similar. Examining outcomes, length of stay, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality were all similar between groups, but total/symptomatic recurrence was higher in the patch group (10%/7% vs. 3%/0%), and the median time to recurrence was 3 months. A sub-analysis comparing those who recurred to those who did not demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups. ConclusionPatients who undergo flap repair have a lower risk of recurrence compared to those who undergo patch repair, and this may be due to the ability of the flap to grow over time with the child. Type of StudyTreatment Study. Level of EvidenceIII

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.