Abstract

Direct-injection in spark-ignition engines has long been recognized as a valid option for improving fuel economy, reducing CO2 emissions and avoiding knock occurrence due to higher flexibility in control strategies. However, problems associated with mixture formation are responsible for soot emissions, one of the most limiting factors of this technology. Therefore, the combustion process and soot formation were investigated with different injection strategies on a gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine. The experimental analysis was realized on an optically accessible single cylinder engine when applying single, double and triple injection strategies. Moreover, the effect of fuel delivery phasing was also scrutinized by changing the start of the injection during late intake- and early compression-strokes. The duration of injection was split in different percentages between two or three pulses, so as to obtain close to stoichiometric operation in all conditions. The engine was operated at fixed rotational speed and spark timing, with wide-open throttle. Optical diagnostics based on cycle resolved digital imaging was applied during the early and late stages of the combustion process. Detailed information on the flame front morphology and soot formation were obtained. The optical data were correlated to in-cylinder pressure traces and exhaust gas emission measurements. The results suggest that the split injection of the fuel has advantages in terms of reduction of soot formation and NOx emissions and a similar combustion performance with respect to the single injection timing. Moreover, an early injection resulted in higher rates of heat release and in-cylinder pressure, together with a reduction of soot formation and flame distortion. The double injection strategy with higher percentage of fuel injected in the first pulse and early second injection pulse showed the best results in terms of combustion evolution and pollutant emissions. For the operative condition studied, a higher time for mixture homogenization and split of fuel injected in the intake stroke shows the best results.

Highlights

  • Gasoline direct injection (GDI) together with downsizing and boosting is surely the most attractive answer to the demand for high energy efficiency of spark ignition (SI) engines [1]

  • An experimental study was undertaken in order to evaluate the effects of split injection in a DISI engine fuelled with commercial gasoline

  • Double and triple injection division was performed for two different strategies (250 and 200 start of injection timing before top dead centre (BTDC))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gasoline direct injection (GDI) together with downsizing and boosting is surely the most attractive answer to the demand for high energy efficiency of spark ignition (SI) engines [1]. The development of new SI engines is needed to fulfil the new EU6 emission standards [2]. This mean an important reduction of exhaust pollutants (HC, CO, NOx) with special attention in the last few years to particulate emission [3]. Direct injection (DI) has advantages over the port-fuel injected (PFI) engines, such as high precision in fuel metering [4], greater flexibility for different operation regimes, low pumping losses and significant potential in fuel economy benefits [5].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call