Abstract

As per regulations and common risk management practice, the credit risk of a portfolio is managed via its potential future exposures (PFEs), expected exposures (EEs), and related measures, the expected positive exposure (EPE), effective expected exposure (EEE) and the effective expected positive exposure (EEPE). Firms use these exposures to set economic and regulatory capital levels. Thus, their values have a big impact on the capital that firms need to hold to manage their risks. Due to the growth of CVA computations, and the similarity of CVA computations to exposure computations, firms find it expedient to compute these exposures under the risk neutral measure. Here we show that such exposures computed under the risk neutral measure are essentially arbitrary. They depend on the choice of numeraire, and can be manipulated by choosing a different numeraire. Even when restricting attention to commonly used numeraires, exposures can vary substantially. As such, it is critical that these calculations be done under the real world measure, not the risk neutral measure.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.