Abstract
Two-level supersaturated designs examine more than N SS − 1 factors in N SS experiments, and as a consequence individual factor effect estimation becomes problematic. In this paper, a new method, called the Fixing Effects and Adding Rows (FEAR) method, is proposed to estimate the effects in supersaturated designs more accurately. The FEAR method is based on the idea that too few experiments are executed to estimate the examined factor effects properly, and therefore zero effect rows are added to the model matrix, followed by consecutively fixing the largest estimated effects. The FEAR method is compared with Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) methods, as forward selection and stepwise regression, and with the alternative ridge regression method. A fully simulated, a partially simulated and an experimental data set were used for the evaluation of the methods. It was found that the FEAR method performs better than the earlier applied MLR and ridge regression methods, since the significant main effects are more accurately estimated and because fewer effects are incorrectly considered being either significant or non-significant.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.