Abstract
Given a set L of labels and a collection of rooted trees whose leaves are bijectively labeled by some elements of L, the Maximum Agreement Supertree (SMAST) problem is given as follows: find a tree T on a largest label set L(') is included in L that homeomorphically contains every input tree restricted to L('). The problem has phylogenetic applications to infer supertrees and perform tree congruence analyses. In this paper, we focus on the parameterized complexity of this NP-hard problem, considering different combinations of parameters as well as particular cases. We show that SMAST on k rooted binary trees on a label set of size n can be solved in O((8n)k) time, which is an improvement with respect to the previously known O(n3k2) time algorithm. In this case, we also give an O((2k)pkn2) time algorithm, where p is an upper bound on the number of leaves of L missing in a SMAST solution. This shows that SMAST can be solved efficiently when the input trees are mostly congruent. Then, for the particular case where any triple of leaves is contained in at least one input tree, we give O(4pn3) and O(3:12p + n4) time algorithms, obtaining the first fixed-parameter tractable algorithms on a single parameter for this problem. We also obtain intractability results for several combinations of parameters, thus indicating that it is unlikely that fixed-parameter tractable algorithms can be found in these particular cases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.