Abstract
Numerous tests designed to detect realized jumps over a fixed time span have been proposed and extensively studied in the financial econometrics literature. These tests differ from “long time span tests” that detect jumps by examining the magnitude of the intensity parameter in the data generating process, and which are consistent. In this paper, long span tests, including the tests of Corradi et al. (2018) (called CSS tests), are compared and contrasted with a variety of fixed span tests, including the ASJ test of A¨it-Sahalia and Jacod (2009), the BNS test of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2006), and the PZ test of Podolskij and Ziggel (2010), in an extensive series of Monte Carlo experiments. The long span tests that we examine are consistent against the null hypothesis of zero jump intensity, while the fixed span tests are not designed to detect jumps in the data generating process, and instead detect realized jumps over a fixed time span. It is found that both the ASJ and CSS tests exhibit reasonably good finite sample properties, for time spans both short and long. The other tests suffer from finite sample distortions, both under sequential testing (as is well known) and under long time spans. The latter finding is new, and confirms the “pitfall” discussed in Huang and Tauchen (2005), of using asymptotic approximations associated with finite time span tests in order to study long time spans of data. An extensive empirical analysis is carried out to investigate the implications of these findings. In particular, when applied to stock price and stock index data, “time-span robust” tests indicate that the prevalence of jumps is not as universal as might be expected. Various sector ETFs and individual stocks, for example, appear to exhibit no jumping behavior during a number of quarterly and annual periods.
Highlights
The reason why a “horse race” comparing alternative jump tests of these varieties is of interest is because it is well known that tests constructed using observed sample paths of asset returns on a “fixed time span”, such as a day or a week, are not consistent against non-zero jump intensity, and are sensitive to sequential testing bias
We carry out a Monte Carlo investigation of long time span jump tests, which are designed to indicate whether the jump intensity in the underlying DGP is identically zero
We find that the long time span tests have good finite sample properties
Summary
Provided in Cooperation with: MDPI – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel. Suggested Citation: Cheng, Mingmian; Swanson, Norman R. (2019) : Fixed and long time span jump tests: New Monte Carlo and empirical evidence, Econometrics, ISSN 2225-1146, MDPI, Basel, Vol 7, Iss. 1, pp. Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen. Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
